User talk:Maquino

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Maquino, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

PS: please read WP:AUTO. Autobiography is discouraged in Wikipedia. -Will Beback 06:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm... Thanks for being alive. It's great fun telling people that one of my relatives is a Satanist. In case you're wondering, I'm a relative of Gertrude Watson, your grandmother. Kazuhite 18:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography[edit]

My Goal here on Wikipedia is to present the facts in a neutral light. Thanks for your massage about the Michael Aquino page. here is what happede when I removed the changes you made: I was watching pages for edits that did not give or show References sporting the new materal on the page. I could not find any References sporting the changes you made, I am vary sorry if I have missed the References you added sporting the changes you had made. I will be looking in to Serurcij"s original posting's, which you clame "lists lie after lie and represents them as facts".

If you can Find references that support what you clame than feel free to change the page but with out facts to back up what you are saying you have no grounds to stand on. Do you understand this?? so I ask the Question to you "What about the truth frightens you?"Max 22:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Hey, could you explain your Temple a bit to me. I'm curious about the subject, it'd be helpful. Thanks, :) Temp

Bio[edit]

I understand completely your desire for the article to be removed altogether, or, failing that, to be kept to a minimum. This website raises a number of ethical questions: that anyone has the 'right' to create a 'biography' on someone, which the subject then has to babysit forever, to defend it from cranks and vindictive trolls who litter it with their mental effluent or slant it to suit their personal prejudices; conversely, one finds people of dubious importance writing promotional puff pieces on themselves, since they are incapable of achieving much in the 'real world' and place strange value in having a Wikipedia article. But the issues transcend that: this site is a veritable hive of misinformation and propaganda in most areas one dares to look. Such is the danger of mindless egalitarianism applied to epistemology, I suppose. Best of luck to you. Richard1968 18:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Left Hand Path Workgroup[edit]

I got together a "Left Hand Path" Work group and am currently trying to bring the Left Hand path articles as a whole up to par. I figured you may be interested and we certainly need help with the Setianism and TOS articles. Though any insight would be helpful. You can find the link on the Satanism discussion page if you're interested. WerewolfSatanist 21:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Article[edit]

Deleted. The user most likely created it in good faith, since it was decently referenced. Ideally it shouldn't be recreated though. Wizardman 00:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains extensive defamatory inaccuracies, as I understand are violations of Wikipedia Standards of Contact. After making several attempts to replace the defamation with simple corrections, the inaccurate original page continued to be restored and finally my ability to correct it blocked. I request Wikipedia Supervisor contact concerning this as soon as possible. I am not a Wikipedia devotee and have no interest in excuses. If Wiki will not eliminate the defamation, I will simply expose it whenever asked about it, to the shame of Wikipedia and this character assassin. My last reokacement effort follows below:

This unsolicited, unauthorized page was apparently created as part of some unofficial military project. As it contained almost complete inaccuracies, the original content has been deleted. I am very tired of anonymous character assassinations, and footnotes to inaccurate sources are no excuse either.

The page-author's inventions may also violate federal law where he/she claims numerous military decorations for me that I have never received nor claimed. The same is the case with fictitious assignments. In the Vitae which I have linked below, these as well as all other page-author falsehoods are corrected.

A current, accurate Vitae is downloadable as a .pdf here:

http://www.rachane.org/docs/AquinoVitae.pdf

A complete list and description of published books may be found here:

http://www.amazon.com/Michael-A.-Aquino/e/B01GEWRIMU

I respectfully ask Wikipedia to delete this page completely and permanently. I believe that Wikipedia has ethical prohibitions against pages defaming still-living individuals, and I request this page deletion accordingly.

Otherwise I will continue correcting these lies until a Wiki supervisor with the authority to stop them takes permanent deletion action. All I ask of the page-author is simply to leave me alone.

Michael A. Aquino Lt. Colonel, U.S. Army (Ret) Xeper@sbcglobal.net

November 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Michael A. Aquino (lieutenant colonel) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Michael A. Aquino (lieutenant colonel). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Home Lander (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Michael A. Aquino (lieutenant colonel), you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Maquino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia Administration has deleted and locked-out the inaccurate and defamatory page on me. That is the only reason I repeatedly attempted to delete it myself. As my account record should show, I have never attempted to edit for malicious or vandalism reasons. In fact I habitually avoid editing, since in my years-ago experience it as often as not just provokes an "editing war", which I have no interest in either. So it's not that I have new editing on the mind, but I don't want a black mark against my Wiki account to continue. Thanks for your understanding and consideration. - Michael Aquino

Accept reason:

Unblocked. If there are any similar problems in future, please contact WP:OTRS to get them addressed. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation?[edit]

In the event of an article that is defamatory about yourself, the best recourse is to follow instructions at Wikipedia:Contact OTRS. Particularly, the email link info-en-q@wikimedia.org – handles issues regarding an article that is written about you. You will need to establish with them that you are the subject of the article or their representative. Hope this helps. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: I'm vaguely familiar with the issue at hand. Is there anything to add? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dlohcierekim! Not that I'm aware of. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:11, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: Would you be OK with an unblock now? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boing! said Zebedee - Yeah that's fine. Go for it. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:55, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]