User talk:Marcd30319/Archive 2016
USNS Hershel "Woody" Williams (T-ESB-4)[edit]
The press release from the Navy announced that as the name of the ship. If in subsequent sources it turns out to be different, (such as Hershel W. Williams) then the page can be changed. It's just a re-direct right now as the ship is no where near completion anyway, so no harm done. And, surely you know that just changing the DISPLAYTITLE template makes no difference, right? If and when more source come available and it turns out the initial announcement was incorrect, we can change the title by way of page move then. For now, I wouldn't worry about it. - theWOLFchild 23:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
I am just about to revert this edit. You may not be aware of WP:RCAT which *specifically* covers categorising redirects. You appear to complain frequently about how WP has obnoxious bureaucracy, but if you took the time to familiarize yourself with the rules (also for example WP:Lead/LEADLENGTH), you might get on much better. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:38, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- As always, you can cite any WP rules you want, but this doesn't square with common sense. SACLANT is an main article on this subject while ACLANT is not. And that category given, Category:NATO military personnel, is populated by people, not positions. More common sense sacrificed on the altar of WP bureaucracy.Marcd30319 (talk) 22:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- We categorise by the subject of the article, not where the majority of the text is. That's what RCAT is designed to do. @Nick-D: we appear to have an impasse here - Marcd30319 is continually reverting and contesting the way the category structure should work, repeatedly placing a title/appointment in a military formations category. Would you please give a third opinion? Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 22:37, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- FYI Category:NATO military appointments. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- We categorise by the subject of the article, not where the majority of the text is. That's what RCAT is designed to do. @Nick-D: we appear to have an impasse here - Marcd30319 is continually reverting and contesting the way the category structure should work, repeatedly placing a title/appointment in a military formations category. Would you please give a third opinion? Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 22:37, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Organization chart of NATO's Allied Command Atlantic (ACLANT), ca. 1954.gif listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Organization chart of NATO's Allied Command Atlantic (ACLANT), ca. 1954.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
,_ca._1954.gif){kind=link}
,_ca._1954.gif){kind=link}
Disambiguation link notification for July 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Legend of Tarzan (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African Congo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Marcd30319. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)