Jump to content

User talk:Marcel flaubert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for Image:Ninasimoneandherfriends.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ninasimoneandherfriends.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Moving and disambiguating pages

[edit]

Please don't perform moves without thinking about them first. "Here Comes the Sun" does not need a disambiguation page. To 99%+ of readers it is a George Harrison/Beatles song. The 1% looking for a cover album by Nina Simone can be directed there by way of a dab link at the top of the Beatles article. 2-entry dab pages, where one of the entries is hugely more famous than the other, are simply not neccessary. --kingboyk 09:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marcel flaubert, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Ninasimonefodderonmywings.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Marcel flaubert. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]
The Working Man's Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions to Nina Simone related pages! -LoserTalent 11:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA nom

[edit]

The article on Nina Simone, which you nominated for GA-status, has been placed on hold for minor improvements by myself. Feel free to contact me with any comments or concerns. VanTucky (talk) 22:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your assessment request

[edit]

If an article passes GA then always feel free to update the banners with that rating. There are no wikiproject-specific GA procedures so it isn't an issue with any other projects. However, if you want an A-class rating you will have to go to our A-class Review Department. Psychless 01:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Foreveryounggiftedandblack.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Foreveryounggiftedandblack.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

[edit]

Hello there

I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.

At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars

If you are interested by all means feel free to join

Regards

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 23:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Marlenashawwhoisthisbitchanyway.jpg

[edit]
Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Marlenashawwhoisthisbitchanyway.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Chowbok 21:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marcel, I noticed that you've been doing a lot of work on this page. Just thought I'd point you to an interesting website that describes the history of the song "Sea Lion Woman" and lets you listen to the original performed by the Shipp sisters is 1939. I've always been fascinated by this tune, which was not originally written by Nina. Go to http://odeo.com/audio/11268763/view. A particular haunting version of the song is entitled "She Began to Lie" from the The General's Daughter soundtrack. This version uses much of the original recording from the Shipp sisters. I'm not sure that the meaning of the lyrics as described in the article is correct since the song was originally a child's folk rhyme (actually a skipping rhyme). There have been lots of theories about the lyrics, (which have been changed over the years as different artists adapted it), but even the original ladies who were recorded singing it in 1939 had no idea what the lyrics meant or for that matter, how the title should be written or pronounced (hence the controversy over the "true" pronunciation and spelling). Since the song has lots of history, a separate article about the song may be warranted. Cheers.BC (talk) 19:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. I listened to Simone's lyrics and they are indeed as you described. I assumed incorrectly that she would have used the same, traditional lyrics. It's interesting how lyrics can be embellished and changed from an innocent folk rhyme to a story about a prostitute. BC (talk) 07:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Brian Crawford, just wanted to say thank you for your comment on the (naming of the) song See Line Woman by Nina Simone. I was not aware of the history of the song other than the Simone version, in which it is pronounced+interpreted as told on the Broadway-Blues-Ballads page. If you have the time than please share your knowledge of the songs+titles origins on that page, or perhaps it's interesting enough to create a seperate song-page!


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ninasimoneiputaspellonyou.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ninasimoneiputaspellonyou.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nina Simone At Town Hall.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Nina Simone At Town Hall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ninasimoneblackgold.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Ninasimoneblackgold.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ninasimoneherecomesthesun.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Ninasimoneherecomesthesun.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on article on Intelligence

[edit]

Wikipedian psychologists are invited to comment on the worthiness of a source on this request for comment. Ward3001 (talk) 21:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ninasimonenuffsaid.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ninasimonenuffsaid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request To Mr. Flaubert to use portrait of Nina

[edit]

Dear Marcel, can we re-use your drawing of Nina Simone for an exhibition in Korea of Danish designer Peter Jensen's work? he used Nina as a muse for one collection, and for the credits we are illustrating each muse with drawings by admirers of each Muse.

There is no money–it's use would be non-commercial–but we would credit your drawing and request your permission in any applications.

Please let us know, Patrick Lacey for åbäke (abakesemail@gmail.com)

86.164.54.234 (talk) 17:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Nina Simone

[edit]

Nina Simone has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Schierbecker (talk) 18:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]