User talk:Mariankkaz

This is Mariankkaz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marian Kazimierczuk (December 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paradise Chronicle was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't know if you know how wikipedia works, but there are only three phrases sourced in the article. WE have standards for sourcing see WP:citing sources and WP:RS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marian Kazimierczuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marian Kazimierczuk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mariankkaz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marian Kazimierczuk has been accepted[edit]

Marian Kazimierczuk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Mariankkaz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see, Mariankkaz, that you violated the first three of these points; you leave me no choice. Drmies (talk) 17:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Marian Kazimierczuk) for obvious COI editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mariankkaz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new to Wikipedia content creation and have just a month of familiarity with content creation and the order of steps to be followed. By mistake, I have removed something added by mistake. I am currently trying to figure out the order of steps to be followed in the correct way. Coming to the COI editing part, I know the person about whom I am currently writing on Wikipedia. He is not my family, friend, colleague (he is a professor at the university where I study and teach labs. I did not take any coursework with him but I taught a lab for him. I am greatly impressed with his achievements, research contributions, teaching, etc., and I gathered information to create a wiki page about him), he is not a competitor, and obviously, I am not paid of any sort to create the page. Please let me know if there is any conflict of interest editing based on the information that I provided and I would like to request you to remove the block on editing; Mariankkaz (talk) 18:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on the information you provide, there's a very clear conflict of interest and you would count as a paid editor. Yamla (talk) 20:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You could have just done what I asked you to do when I asked you to do it. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]