User talk:Mariellesolander

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Mariellesolander (talk · contribs) has been paid by Spoon Agency on behalf of Seco Tools.

This is Mariellesolander's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seco Tools (March 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources cited fail to provide the kind of significant coverage required for notability per WP:ORGCRIT. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seco Tools and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seco Tools, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mariellesolander! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hi Mariellesolander! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Mariellesolander. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Seco Tools, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seco Tools (May 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Seco Tools. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Company no longer exists and is just a part of Sandvik which is a page that would be nicely helped by this additional information. There is also heavy use of primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seco Tools and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seco Tools, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 09:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I have some questions regarding the review.

Seco Tools is an existing publicly listed company and not just a part of Sandvik. Where do the info that says otherwise come from?

Wikipedia proposes a merge into the existing article of Seco Tools, though i can not see that such a page exists. The referenced link do not go anywhere.

What makes the sources not reliable? Almost all of them are from third party sources like the Swedish tax authorities, Fagersta tourist information or industry press. Is it that the sources are in swedish? The primary sources that I have used references to the products that Seco Tools produce and their product catalog. Isn't that a reliable source in this subject.

"The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own" but the swedish wikipedia assesses that it does. Even though the swedish page has less info and less sources than this one. https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seco_Tools. Why is that?

Best, Mariellesolander (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for giving the incorrect possible merge location, I meant to suggest the possibility of a merge to Sandvik.

My primary reason for declining the submission was the use of primary sources, namely references 4, 8, 12, 13, 14 and 15. There are some useful links in the notice at the top of the page talking about sourcing that might be of interest.

After providing that reason I added in the "merge to" template to suggest that one option, rather than a stand alone page for what is now a wholly owned subsidiary, would be adding the information to the Sandvik page instead. You should feel free to ignore that suggestion and resubmit it after working on the sources however I wanted to suggest it as a possibility in case you hadn't considered it.

I hope that that helps.

Gusfriend (talk) 10:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COI query, again[edit]

Hello Mariellesolander,

I posted earlier a message here on your talk page inviting you to disclose any relationship you may have with the company Seco Tools, and on a related but separate point, to disclose any payments you are receiving or expect to receive for your editing. I don't believe you have responded to my query. Please do so now; the details for how to do this are shown in my earlier message above.

Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DoubleGrazing,

I apologize! I missed the message you’re mentioning and was not aware of the fact that the information should be disclosed. Can you please show me how to do this?

I work for a communications agency that was tasked by Seco Tools to help them translate and develop their existing Swedish Wikipedia article page (https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seco_Tools) Mariellesolander (talk) 10:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two messages earlier on this same page is a section titled 'Managing a conflict of interest', which provides the instructions and more information. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Seco Tools has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Seco Tools. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 10:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seco Tools (June 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seco Tools and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seco Tools, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 10:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]