User talk:Mark Mireles

Mark Mireles, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Mark Mireles! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Mireles (January 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You are strongly discouraged from writing about yourself as you have a conflict of interest.

If you still want to work on the draft, there are several issues that need to be addressed.

The draft is currently written from a promotional point of view. Write from a neutral point of view. Every sentence must cite a reliable source to comply with the Wikipedia policy on verifiability (primary sources can also be used for verifying information). For information on how to add references, see referencing for beginners. External links must not be embedded into the text like this.

Please also find at least three independent reliable sources that talk about the subject in detail (not just mentions) to show notability. For examples of reliable and unreliable sources, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Mireles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Mireles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 21:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mark Mireles, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Curbon7 (talk) 02:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry[edit]

I have closed the case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mark Mireles in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator. In this case, due to your comments and your account's new age, I am assuming that your decision was made in good faith. Therefore, the only action I am going to take is to give you advice about sockpuppetry. The policy about using multiple accounts, or sockpuppetry as it is commonly known on Wikipedia, is Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. Editors are generally expected to use one account. However, using multiple accounts is not necessarily against policy. It becomes an issue when the accounts are misused. A list of what is and what isn't a appropriate use of multiple accounts can be found in the policy, but unless you have need to, it is a good idea to stick to one account. In any case, unless the account is used for privacy, accounts you control should be connected in a clear way.

In this case, I strongly recommend using with one account from now on. If you do decide to use both accounts in a legitimate way, please ensure that you don't use the accounts in any of the ways listed in the policy as inappropriate. I'm happy to answer questions you may have about sockpuppetry here or at my talk page. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 23:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Mireles (January 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Self-promotional. Needs more external news sources outside the official websites and organizations he has worked for.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Mireles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Mireles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page is about a public figure Mark Mireles with historical and factual references. Those events credited to Mark are from police reports and news sources. His professional writing section is linked to all his books, should those be referenced and not linked to their Amazon pages? Could I have some more clarity on how to remedy this from looking and feeling more like an advertisement. I am writing pointing out his accomplishments with references. I am very new to creating a Wikipedia page and any guidance to get this published would be a lifesaver for me, and a good learning opportunity as well.

COI notice[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Mireles (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Several of the sections are still unsourced and filled with promotional language.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Mireles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Mireles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Mireles (January 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

This is a dog's breakfast, not an article. It is nowhere near ready for submission. Why, in particular, are there two references sections? Why are most "references" untethered to whatever it is they are referencing. Please study WP:REFBEGIN. Please do NOT resubmit until the article is clean, tidy and compliant. Fair to say you are at the last chance motel right now.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Mireles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Mireles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 01:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Mireles (February 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mark Mireles[edit]

Hello, Mark Mireles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Mireles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Mireles[edit]

Hello, Mark Mireles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark Mireles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]