User talk:Mark Nelson

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mark Nelson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Esowteric+Talk 10:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark Nelson. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mark Nelson (scientist), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 02:34, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some editing I've done[edit]

I was unaware when I started of the conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you Gab4Gab for bringing them to my attention. I have been editing some pages because I wanted to improve their factualness, add to the discussions contained therein, to add more scientific references when articles were heavily depend on only popular press articles. In future I will endeavor to put suggestions on those pages for other people to incorporate or not, as they see fit. I do not receive any money from the enterprises I once ran (such as Wastewater Gardens International) nor for my work at Institute of Ecotechnics and its research consultancies. Regarding the Biosphere 2 website, the history is complex and my edits have been designed to add more information about its early history and to balance some of the interesting topics, such as the validity of differing approaches to science or to flesh out important research carried out during the years Columbia University operated the facility. Adding more scholarly articles, books and scientific journal papers enables the interested reader to get a fuller view of the project.

Thank you for responding regarding conflict of interest. One thing that may seem helpful that should be avoided is adding facts and insights based on personal knowledge that aren't supported by published sources. Verifiability is one of the core content policies of Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions and your commitment to follow the conflict of interest guidelines. Gab4gab (talk) 17:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COIs aside, the enhancements are pretty professional, thanks. Esowteric+Talk 18:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]