Jump to content

User talk:Mark Rhodes 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mark Rhodes 12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Mark Rhodes 12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


Welcome

[edit]

Hi Mark Rhodes 12! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —¿philoserf? (talk) 22:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

 — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mark Rhodes 12 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked because I'm not Rymax23 Mark Rhodes 12 (talk) 18:43, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A simple denial is not sufficient in sockpuppetry cases, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so. This block is a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it(evidence that only checkusers have access to). If you are not Rymax23, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why the technical evidence indicates otherwise. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Look

[edit]

I'm sorry for adding unnecessary characters to the Marvel Comics navigation boxes. Please don't remove this from my talk page. Mark Rhodes 12 (talk) 19:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]