User talk:Maronaut

Draft:Jamaican Moist Forest concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jamaican Moist Forest, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jamaican Moist Forest[edit]

Hello, Maronaut. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jamaican Moist Forest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kamau Mahakoe moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Kamau Mahakoe, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 10:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the citations are to back up the existence of the books and not to back up the article, which might have led to some confusion. I removed all of those. I also removed data which I cannot find a citation for (but knew). The article relies on six sources, of which five are newspaper articles which are about the subject, the school, or her family, and mention the subject and her actions. The sixth is an autobiography, and therefore self-published. I hope it's useful as an autobiography is a way to get information which is difficult to get elsewhere, and most peoples' autobiographies are probably not too untruthful on where and how they found their interests. But, that material can also go, which would leave the material from the school ,for which she has gained most of her notability, and which is spoken about most in the media coverage. I don't believe a peer reviewed article is appropriate for this subject, though they has received media coverage otherwise. Is it fine if the article is short but the information in it is cited and also relevant to the citations? How many citations are required? --Maronaut (talk) 05:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added the ISBNs. Is this good for resubmition? --Maronaut (talk) 07:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I italicized the book names, too. Maronaut (talk) 21:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamau Mahakoe (July 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You may not use the books she has written as references. They are the product she makes. Let me try to explain. If they manufactured vacuum cleaners, the cleaners would be their work. A vacuum cleaner could not be a reference for them, simply because it is the product they make. So it is with research, writings, etc. However, a review of their work by others tends to be a review of them and their methods, so is a reference, as is a peer reviewed paper a reference for their work.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamau Mahakoe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kamau Mahakoe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 10:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maronaut! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 10:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kamau Mahakoe has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kamau Mahakoe. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 06:52, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kamau Mahakoe has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kamau Mahakoe. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 11:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamau Mahakoe (October 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for resubmitting the draft. I have reviewed the article, including all of the references provided, and it does not appear that the subject meets the notability guidelines for biographies at this time. The independent published references focus on her children's accomplishments, and the others are not independent, reliable sources. Please feel free to respond on my or your talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamau Mahakoe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kamau Mahakoe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 18:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kamau Mahakoe[edit]

Hello, Maronaut. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kamau Mahakoe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]