Jump to content

User talk:Marquardtika

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2024 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antonio Felipe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andres Ayala.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bero chandio

[edit]

Why the hell u keep removing the notable persons colum? Bro like wtf is wrong with you.!!! 2401:8E00:400F:36C7:CD1C:C6F0:56CF:477A (talk) 14:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

[edit]

Kat Timpf

[edit]

It's in her new book about her bisexuality. [1]https://variety.com/2024/tv/news/fox-news-kat-timpf-book-i-used-to-like-you-until-1236133025/ Wlmg (talk) 11:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should add the content/source to the article. Without that already being in the article, the category is unsourced. Marquardtika (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eric Kessler for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Kessler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Kessler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Also, this is being discussed at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Question about my page. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

[edit]

Women in Red October 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]

Removal of Courier Newsroom sources

[edit]

Hi Marquardtika! Just wanted to note my comments at Talk:Theresa Greenfield#Iowa Starting Line source on your user talk page as well, since I realize now that they're related to recent edits you've made on several articles (possibly also your edits on Courier Newsroom). Up to you whether you prefer to discuss here or on the article talk page. I appreciate that the underlying goal is to improve sourcing on articles about political topics – this is important to me as well. Dreamyshade (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I replied at Talk:Theresa Greenfield#Iowa Starting Line source. Marquardtika (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Edit Summaries

[edit]

I suggest that you write edit summaries so that it's easier for other editors like me to follow and know the reason for the edits. Nohorizonss (talk) 16:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do try to use edit summaries. Is there a specific place where I forgot to do so? Marquardtika (talk) 13:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharon Weston Broome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Troy Carter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

[edit]

Reversion of edit to "Mazi Melesa Pilip" page

[edit]

Hi, I'd appreciate if you addressed my comments on Talk:Mazi Melesa Pilip regarding your summary reversion of this edit. I believe Pilip's stance on mask-wearing is relevant for inclusion—it is the issue for which she is arguably best known nationally due to the widespread press coverage of the mask law she sponsored—and that (in accordance with the policy of WP:NPOV you cite in your edit summary) my account of it fairly presented both her and her supporters' justification of, as well as public opposition to, the legislation in question. RecursiveCoda (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ACLU input

[edit]

Hey, if you have time, could you look at Talk:American_Civil_Liberties_Union#Positions_section? and provide any input. Thx. Noleander (talk) 14:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

[edit]

Women in Red February 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

  • Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history

Tip of the month:

Suggestion:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

[edit]

National Philanthropic Trust

[edit]

Hello,

I have been attempting to update the Senior Leadership page for my client National Philanthropic Trust to mention updates to their current CEO Holly Welch Stubbing but I see that you keep reverting these changes. Can you explain why you are doing this? We would like this page to reflect current and accurate information about our organization and leadership team. How can we make this change in a way that it does not keep getting reverted back to out dated information? Thanks! Goldilocks981 (talk) 15:16, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Goldilocks981: Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You should not be editing the page yourself since you have a COI. It sounds like you also need to follow WP:PAY. There are instructions at the link for how to disclose who is paying you. To request that other editors implement your suggested changes, use {{edit COI}} . I can tell you right off the bat that the edits you are making violate WP:PROMOTION--the writing should be encyclopedic, not akin to what you would find on a group's own website, and WP:NOTRESUME. Marquardtika (talk) 15:24, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mike lawler

[edit]

Stop removing my edits about him in black face, please and thank you. Jamesminzesheimerpol (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]