User talk:Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2008/February
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Martijn Hoekstra. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Donk?
A very good fellow has just done what I recommended would happen if we kept Donk, and added sources all over the place. I would ask that you change your vote before it gets deleted by error. Cheers.JJJ999 (talk) 02:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I commented on the AfD, I haven't switched to keep though. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Pro-pedophile activism
Hi, could you pop over to the MedCom wiki and take a look at a way to move forward? I've copied over the introduction and would like everyone be bold an make changes to it, hopefully we should be able to thrash out a consensus. Take a look at this. Ryan Postlethwaite 20:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm on it. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Not mistake
No, it wasn't a mistake. It's listed at Wikipedia:Personal user awards, but there are several awards pages listed. I've spent enough time trying to track down certain other awards in order to apply them that I know I've really wish for some redirects to save me the time. I spent so much time tracking down the Barnstar of Good Humor in order to award it to somebody last night that I really wished for a redirect to it. I'm not going to go through and create redirects for everybody's awards (although now that I mention that, it sounds like a good idea to me), but I can at least simplify any search for the one I created. Doczilla (talk) 21:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- But in mainspace? Why not in WP: space? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I suppose. Anyway, I've moved it into my userpages while I reconsider it. Thanks for asking. If one person so quickly thought it looked screwy, you certainly wouldn't be the last. Doczilla (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, that worked very well. A test search now finds the barnstar via redirect where it didn't before. (It really seems like search should have found it before.) Doczilla (talk) 21:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- You may want to have it deleted from mainspace though, with a {{db-author}}. Mainspace is really not the place for anything project related. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I used page move to get it out of mainspace. Doczilla (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- For the remaining redirect I meant. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, right. That one slipped my mind. Thanks. Doczilla (talk) 21:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, right. That one slipped my mind. Thanks. Doczilla (talk) 21:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- For the remaining redirect I meant. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I used page move to get it out of mainspace. Doczilla (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- You may want to have it deleted from mainspace though, with a {{db-author}}. Mainspace is really not the place for anything project related. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, that worked very well. A test search now finds the barnstar via redirect where it didn't before. (It really seems like search should have found it before.) Doczilla (talk) 21:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I suppose. Anyway, I've moved it into my userpages while I reconsider it. Thanks for asking. If one person so quickly thought it looked screwy, you certainly wouldn't be the last. Doczilla (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Mdb2341 / speedy deletion / changes to inuse article
I had an article (Sopje) marked as inuse and when I was done, there was an edit conflict. user:mdb2341 had editted the page, undoing some earlier changes, and when i checked his user page, I saw your speedy deletion notice. Was a bit confused as to what was going on / who it was / what was up with the deletion, etc.
- -JasonSpradlin82 (talk) 23:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- That user started the article How to make your own wickapidea page. It was a test page, and I tagged it for speedy deletion as a test page. Does that answer your question? If not, just let me know. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- I guess so. I guess I just wanted to know if it was ok for me to re-apply my changes, plus many more. The user doesn't seem to have ever done anything before and I was concerned as to why he would care what changes I made, especially since I referenced my sources. -JasonSpradlin82 (talk) 23:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Being bold in your changes is generally a good idea. As a note, conact information is generaly not seen as encyclopedic content. I have therefore removed it from the article for now. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Will make a note of that. -JasonSpradlin82 (talk) 00:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Sīla (disambiguation)
Thank You for Your message about Sīla (disambiguation). Investigating the problem, I have just noticed that there exists already another Sila (disambiguation) page. I have already merged the content of this page there, thus this page is no longer necessary. Thus, I have finally followed Your second proposal and I have put Template:Db-author on top of the page.
Best wishes,
Physis (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- yeah, I noticed what you did. Excellent work. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh come on.
The article's not even up a minute and it's already tagged with a drive-by refimprove? I'm going to remove it, if you have questions that are not answered in the attached refs or the main article, tag those statements. Maury (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, Maury, thanks for taking the courtisy of dropping by, and discussing your problems with my edits. The reason why I tagged it, is because there were many claims, that go completely unsourced. I haven't checked if those claims are verified in the two references you provided, but I do believe the article should have more footnotes, even if they point to the same references, to make the article easier to verify. How do you stand on that? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well if you feel there are claims that are not properly referenced, please tag them individually. Remember, all statements do not require a reference, only "statements of fact" that are not obvious or trivially referenced in-place. For instance, the upper section on fusion is an extract from a fully referenced article that is linked in, so it doesn't need to be additionally referenced here (IMHO). If there are statements of fact lower in the article, in the MTF sections, stick a tag on them. Otherwise I'm at a loss as to what those "many claims, that go completely unsourced" are. Maury (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'll stick in some tags later, I'll add it to my todo list, you should see some tomorrow this time. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well if you feel there are claims that are not properly referenced, please tag them individually. Remember, all statements do not require a reference, only "statements of fact" that are not obvious or trivially referenced in-place. For instance, the upper section on fusion is an extract from a fully referenced article that is linked in, so it doesn't need to be additionally referenced here (IMHO). If there are statements of fact lower in the article, in the MTF sections, stick a tag on them. Otherwise I'm at a loss as to what those "many claims, that go completely unsourced" are. Maury (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
(undent) I looked at the tags that were posted. All of them were stated quite directly in the references. I remain confused! Maury (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I couldn't find them in the text of the refs. Could you maybe post the quotes where you reference it from, I'll update the references myself then. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
RFA
If you are interested, I answered your question concerning the UAA reports. Icestorm815 • Talk 03:03, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
audio surf
hi I think this game is notable, because its a first of its kind, using audio tracks to create an environment for a game is novel. I have added a line on this and removed the delete notice., and as per instructions added a note in the discussion page for it. Robin48gx (talk) 07:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
I can has thankspam?
Quick, let's delete the front page!
|
PS: Thanks in particular for the comments you made: while a plain support is always welcome, saying something extra as you did is really appreciated! Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 09:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
RFA
|
Thanks for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully with 40 supports, 13 opposes, and 4 neutrals. For those of you who supported my RFA, I greatly appreciate it. For those who did not, I'm also thankful for your constructive criticism. If you need some advice or have some pointers for me, you know where to reach me! A special thank you to Majorly for all his time and effort he has placed in my nomination. Once again, thank you all for your helpful comments. Now off to new admin school! Cheers, Icestorm815 • Talk 01:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 8 | 18 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 9 | 25 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
One last fact tag...
Would you mind taking another look at Magnetized target fusion and looking for the fact tag? The "problem" here is that it is an "inverse statement"... in order to "prove" it one would have to include an unlimited number of references. Do you really think this needs a ref? If so, what sort of ref would satisfy it? Maury (talk) 12:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)