User talk:Marvellousol

November 2022[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bilby (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marvellousol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Honestly, this is my only account at the moment, this account is not a duplicate of any, it is my only account on here so I don't understand why it is termed a sockpuppet account so I would like you to calmly look into this Marvellousol (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below and as per "at the moment". Yamla (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Marvellousol. Your recent edit to Joseph Carraro introduced exactly the same content as a previously blocked editor here. The almost identical content seems more than coincidental. - Bilby (talk) 09:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marvellousol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, frankly about the recent edit to the page you mentioned above, I have nothing to do with the previously blocked user that once edited the page, I've only used this my only accounts for all Wikipedia edits, please look into this. This is the only account I've used ever. I don't have any connection to the other user that also edited the page. Our edit content is not exactly the same, I have checked, they aren't the same. Please look into this as soon as possible. Marvellousol (talk) 09:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is likely meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I promise it's not, I don't know the person you associated my account with, I have nothing to do with the person, so why would my block be associated with the person's? Please look into this and do all you can to find out the fact.