User talk:Mary Jessica Parsons
| This user is a student editor in Trent_University/History_of_Western_Canada_(Winter_2018) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Mary Jessica Parsons, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Article Evaluation
[edit]The majority of the article is relevant to the article topic. The short section regarding the Red River Rebellion in modern pop culture, while interesting, could have been removed, as it provides little significance to the topic being discussed.
The author remains neutral throughout the article when discussing the actions and ideas of members of the both the Red River settlement and the Canadian government.
The article could be improved by including more information on the legacy of the Red River Rebellion, as it has been a major contributor to the shaping of Canada.
The links to the first ten citations work and lead to content that is informative and relevant to the topic being discussed.
The sources used throughout this article are considered neutral, reliable sources. The author drew information from sources such as Library and Archives Canada and the Dictionary of Canadian Biography, which is created by the University of Toronto. The information is referenced accordingly throughout the article.
The talk page for this article is very active, commenting on and discussing elements of the article such as important individuals who should be included in the article, new information that should be included in the article, irrelevant information that could be removed for the article, and information that is not referenced or paraphrased properly.
Overall, the article is well written and provides sufficient and well-organized information on the topic at hand.