Jump to content

User talk:Almamo18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Maryam.alavinia)

Please don’t bite me, I’m a newbie!

I’m a university student in a Wikipedia Education class, and I’m currently learning how to contribute to Wikipedia.
I am approaching my subject in good faith.

If you have any concerns or questions, my tutor’s name is Almamo18 (talk · contribs). Thanks!


Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Maryam.alavinia and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Go through our online training for students

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Adam9007 (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

course prep

[edit]

Hi Maryam, how is course prep going? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shimashahbazi17 (talkcontribs) 11:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's going anyways--Maryam.alavinia (talk) 12:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hi Maryam, I really enjoy teaching with you! Alixthö (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

I hope you have a nice day Mimi0417 (talk) 22:18, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hi Maryam, i really enjoy learning with you! Kaxrine (talk) 22:19, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hi Maryam, hope you are having a good day ^^. Superleolin1996 (talk) 22:20, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hi Maryam, i really enjoy teaching with you!Freshhaha (talk) 22:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hello

[edit]

Hi Maryam, nice headbandMMLPSSLP (talk) 22:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 13:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Maryam.alavinia! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 13:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Political repression in South Korea has been accepted

[edit]
Political repression in South Korea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 22:45, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stance-taking in Presidential Debates, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stance-taking in Presidential Debates, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maryam.alavinia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stance-taking in Presidential Debates".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 12:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maryam.alavinia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stance taking in presidential debates".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox requirement

[edit]

Hi, I came here because I was told by your student May122789 that infoboxes are required on your students' articles. On Wikipedia, we generally use infoboxes only on concrete topics. Most articles about ideas or abstract concepts don't have them according to consensus. Since the article knowledge of the Holocaust in Nazi Germany and German-occupied Europe is an abstract concept, I don't know what you would put in an infobox, so I hope you will exempt them from this requirement. As an aside, this article is the most impressive contribution that I've ever seen from a student editor! (t · c) buidhe 14:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, one of your students, Thabiso Molai (talk · contribs), keeps trying to add out-of-scope content to the Grand Preceptor article with the rationale that such content should remain on that page until they are graded. Please tell the relevant parties to not re-add content into Wikipedia articles for the express purpose of being graded without addressing the concerns for their removal. Such behaviour (especially reverting without explanation) is edit warring and may get the student blocked. Thanks. _dk (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]