User talk:Matheus8fly

Notability of Ségio Abreu

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ségio Abreu, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ségio Abreu seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ségio Abreu, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Fred Vox

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fred Vox, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sangue do Meu Sangue has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ron Ritzman (talk) 18:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Sangue do meu Sangue (1995)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sangue do meu Sangue (1995), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Sangue do Meu Sangue. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Golden Body

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Golden Body, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Corpo Dourado. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Matheus8fly! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 873 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Flávio Galvão - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Petrônio Gontijo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Maurício Mattar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Irene Ravache - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Guilherme Fontes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Ilya São Paulo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Marcos Palmeira - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Brasileiras e Brasileiros for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brasileiras e Brasileiros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brasileiras e Brasileiros until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RJFJR (talk) 02:44, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marcos Winter

The article Marcos Winter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced / no assertion of importance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ilya São Paulo

The article Ilya São Paulo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)