User talk:Mattc1000

Mattc1000, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

ASafo Dgy Jjhiih.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.189.162.3 (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattc1000! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 21:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Tom Barkhuizen. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 14:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Tom Barkhuizen does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Harry ^{Let us have speaks} 14:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Darren Holden (footballer), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Giant Snowman 18:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Oxford United F.C.. Harry ^{Let us have speaks} 18:45, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin De Bruyne, you may be blocked from editing. Kareldorado (talk) 17:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Marcus Bettinelli. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kyle Callan-McFadden, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Manchester United F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JMHamo (talk) 15:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordan Houghton[edit]

The article Jordan Houghton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jordan Houghton for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Houghton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Houghton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 18:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Victorien Angban (footballer, born 1996) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victorien Angban (footballer, born 1996) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victorien Angban (footballer, born 1996) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qed237 (talk) 16:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt[edit]

Since most its content is user generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do no cite the website in articles, as you did with Daniel Pappoe. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop citing Transfermarkt in articles, as you did with 2015–16 Carpi F.C. 1909 season. As I've already explained to you, the website is not a reliable source and may not be used. If you continue to do so, your edits will be regarded as disruptive. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2015–16 Chelsea F.C. season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 2015–16 Chelsea F.C. Reserves season. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I've explained to you twice already that Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Continuing to cite the website nonetheless is disruptive. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:06, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2015–16 Chelsea F.C. Reserves season for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015–16 Chelsea F.C. Reserves season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015–16 Chelsea F.C. Reserves season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qed237 (talk) 02:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Chelsea F.C. Reserves season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bergerac and St Helens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ola Aina[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ola Aina, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://thechels.info/wiki/Ola_Aina.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ola Aina[edit]

The article Ola Aina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2015–16 Arsenal F.C. season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 15:57, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jordan Houghton‎. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ruben Loftus-Cheek page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Woking F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Braintree. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Woking F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Marco Amelia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Addition of unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Mattc1000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]