User talk:Mattgibbins
Hi, please review WP:COPYREQ before you attempt to upload other people's images to Wikipedia based on them having given you permission to do so. Thanks! -- But|seriously|folks 17:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, I had a good look around but couldn't find the best way to tag it. I asked the person who took it if I could use it on the wikipedia article which he said was fine and I selected 'The author gave me permission to use this image' on the selection box so I'm not sure the best way to tag it after that. If you can assist me in tagging it correctly it'd be much appreciated. Mattgibbins 17:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use disputed for Image:DarrenBent.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:DarrenBent.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Crassic 02:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Tomáš Pekhart[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Tomáš Pekhart, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomáš Pekhart (2nd nomination). Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 05:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:RobbieKeane.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)