Jump to content

User talk:Mattplaysthedrums/Archives/2021/August

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mattplaysthedrums, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Mattplaysthedrums! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


restoration of Idaho Air National Guard

Hi! I noticed that you recently reverted the CSD and blanking. The content was all copyright violation, and therefore cannot exist on WP and must be blanked and tagged with CSD-G13. I'm going to undo your revert. Again, thanks for doing Recent Changes and acting preemptively, but also check the revision reasons; not all blanks are malicious. Sennecaster (talk) 01:30, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 02:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

your PROD of Romi Mayes

Please check article histories for vandalism before prodding an article. An IP had removed all of the content of this article. Meters (talk) 03:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mattplaysthedrums! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 09:22, Tuesday, March 30, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Rollback granted

Hi Mattplaysthedrums. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked

sd .

  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure youaeawef 'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TheSandDoctor Talk 15:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for editing bell hooks

Hi Matt

Realkly sorry for my bad edits on bell hooks, wasnt aware it was bad.

I will buy you a new drum kit to say sorry.

Many Thanks Bell Hooks Least favourite fan — Preceding unsigned comment added by BellHooksSucks (talk • contribs) 00:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

At least you learnt your lesson. I highly recommend you have a look at Introduction to Wikipedia to help you edit Wikpedia in a more positive light. Mattplaysthedrums f\awdfa (talk) 01:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

I apologise for my bel hooks fan friend

Dear mr drums,


i apologise sincerely for my friend who adores bell hooks, he is not aware of the procedures in your talk page and we are sorry for clogging it up,

bel ho\fes\oks is a fine woman and she is to be respected in the political spectrum, amen, god bless her soul. \wafdd

from Brian Rose

---

yo matt wtf

Don't talk like that. I reverted your edit because you didn't provide a source. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 22:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Rodney Alcala

I don't get how my edit wasn't neutral. Can you explain to me, please? I tried to make it neutral.

-RyanElder

My apologies. It was a mistake on my behalf. I have reverted back to your edit. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 02:57, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Matt

Thanks for noticing the changes I made on the Susan Pearson wikipedia page. I redid them but put in an explanation. Shoopee (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Understood. I removed the edit because you didn't provide an edit summary. Thanks for redoing the edit. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 03:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)


edit of Ludwig Von Mises page revision

Thanks for reaching out. I think you are mistaken because it's the other person whose moniker is literally "BasedMises" who has an issue with point of view & bias. If you have some specific criticism for the information I've written, I would be glad to hear it, but if you read the information, it's all cited from Mises' own works, or those of his contemporaries & understudies. Where is the "neutral point of view" being broken?

The best selling female albums

I'M WORKING ON THIS PAGE I KNOW THAT INFORMATION IS MISSING BUT I'M WORKING ON THATAlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 02:06, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

If you are still working on a page, you should create a sandbox in your own userspace. It has the potential to be a good article, but you should try to publish articles once they have enough content and reliable sources. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 02:09, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 02:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MicroWiki (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 10:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Blaise de Lasseran Montluc

I don't know why you reverted my Montluc work for lack of sources, I provided 3 sources. You could see them in the footnotes with page numbers attached. If you're referring to the material I put in the article lede, I didn't reference that because its all referenced in the body Sovietblobfish (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

The only unreferenced work in the article is most of the material that was there previously. Which is what you reverted it to. Sovietblobfish (talk) 01:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

I was referring to the material that you had put into the article, which wasn't referenced with inline citations. However, you did include references at the bottom of the page, so it was a mistake on my behalf. I have removed my rollback. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 01:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Sovietblobfish (talk) 01:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Monterey Pop Festival edit

Hi,

You reversed my recent edit on the above page as you felt it wasn't constructive, but what's interesting is that I felt compelled to edit Ravi Shankar's section after viewing the end of the documentary tonight and his rousing reception from the audience, as I thought the current wording was not only not constructive, but almost derogatory. "All other musical acts played to a packed house" (which isn't even stated in the referenced footnote; the original source says that the other acts sold all their tickets, not how they were attended) doesn't really have a point except to make an offhand comment that Shankar was less popular and even poorly received (not true), which is why I felt that adding an *actual quote from the footnote referenced* ("each of the extended works was greeted with orchid tossing ovations") would better serve both the artist and the historical record of this touchstone in popular culture. Thanks.

Shana Feste

Hi Matt,

The source is myself, I am the person she did this to and I am the one updating the ACCURATE INFO YOU KEEP DELETING. You are now getting the confirmation that all of my edits are correct and that this actually happened straight from the horse's mouth. Can you please stop deleting my changes as I am confirming that I have an accurate source, myself? So you can put that in the references if you feel so compelled to do so. I have no idea how to respond to your message so this is the only thing I could figure out to do to contact you. Thanks! Also, if you delete or change my edits, please provide me with a legitimate reason for doing so, like how you would know about this story and information better than I do. How do you actually know Shana and about her bio? Do you even know Shana?

When you contribute to Wikipedia, you NEED to cite a reliable source. This does not include word of mouth theories or original research. By citing sources for Wikipedia content, you enable users to verify that the information given is supported by reliable sources, thus improving the credibility of Wikipedia while showing that the content is not original research. If you need help referencing sources, see Help:Referencing for beginners. I reverted your edit because you didn't have a reliable source, and this is a legitimate reason for doing so. Original research is not permitted on Wikipedia. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 04:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the threats Matt and for attempting to silence a reliable source!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FU2020 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

My source is now going to the press to have these events documents and published to the public so they can meet your rules as a confirmed and reliable reference. Thank you!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FU2020 (talk • contribs) 20:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Inaccuracy

Hello Mr. Drums,

Just stopping by to let you know the changes made to the page of Puntland is indeed accurate as of 06-07-2021 and the sources are oral along with working with the Government of Puntland itself . Please do not change or delete the changes without consulting me first. Thank you! Sincerely NatalieNatalie904 (talk) 23:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Natalie. There is no system on Wikipedia for verifying unpublished oral claims. Wikipedia content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Your edit was without a citation to a reliable and published source, therefore I was able to remove it. If you want, please redo the edit with an appropriate citation. I left a link on your talk page on how to cite sources. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 00:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hűvösvölgy has been accepted

Hűvösvölgy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... Hi. I recently wrote an article about the Millenáris Park in Budapest. It was deleted soon after without discussion as it had according to @Onel5969: not enough sources. I have taken the article back to the sandbox and have tried my best to add more sources. I would like to know if the sources are enough or if I should add more before I publish the article again. That's all. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 02:09, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Courtesy link to Millenáris (park). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Millenáris has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Millenáris. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Millenáris (park) has been accepted

Millenáris (park), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: War Memorial Drive, Adelaide has been accepted

War Memorial Drive, Adelaide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:33, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cruising Yacht Club of South Australia (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
It is a very old club so may well be notable. However the one reference provided is routine coverage. Please add references that show that the club has been written about in depth by multiple reliable, independent publications such as books or national newspapers.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Photo Ivan Moody

After last week, it's suggested to request to others before making any changes. Does anyone object to adding a more recent photo of Ivan Moody performing live? If this is ok, can we do this without an edit war?. The photo will be of Ivan. Let us know thanks -

Dude

Why are you removing my piece on Ian MacKaye’s little red hat? It was on the Fugazi article before and I found it funny.

forbetterscience

Hi Matt,

Thanks for helping me improve the David M. Sabatini page on Wikipedia. I was trying to add sources to the paragraph that I added, but unfortunately the website that the sources were from is inexplicably on the global Wikipedia blacklist -- forbetterscience dot com.

This website is actually a blog maintained by renowned science journalist commentator and watchdog Leonid Schneider. The page often has thoroughly researched and meticulously presented details of scientific fraud by prominent members of the scientific community. I suspect that someone requested that this website be added to the Wikipedia blacklist because they did not want details of their fraudulent or sloppy scientific conduct to come to the public eye.

As a member of the scientific community, I feel that blacklisting this website is a disservice to the scientific and academic enterprise, and I have submitted a request to get the website removed from the Wikipedia blacklist, so I can provide references to the section I wish to add. The pages I want to reference contain sound reporting, and I was trying to include them here but I keep hitting the Wiki blacklist. I would love to share these with you so you can take a look for yourself and decide if they feel like libel or spam to you (I can assure you, almost no one in the scientific community would say so).

Thank you for helping me improve the content on Wikipedia.

Talk page

Do not edit my talk page without permission. -69.121.9.199 (talk) 01:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

You are removing warnings that have been put there for a reason. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 01:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
That is none of your concern. -69.121.9.199 (talk) 01:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Note that the warning templates are still visible in your talk page history and that they still apply to you. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 01:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Requests to other editors to abstain from leaving messages on your talk page are not binding, and they generally do not apply to conduct warnings (see WP:NOBAN). jp×g 01:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Hi, I heard you were a new host. If you are not busy I have a few questions for you. please reply! Hazel-Juniour (talk) 21:03, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi there @Hazel-Juniour! Thanks for the wafels. How may I help you? Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 22:46, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattplaysthedrums/Archives/2021/August&oldid=1047431626"