User talk:Mavis789

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Big Brother 2009 (UK). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –túrian^patois 00:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 2009 (UK), you will be blocked from editing. Darrenhusted (talk) 23:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Big Brother 2009 (UK). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. DJ 23:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The nominations tables on BB04 and BB09[edit]

First, the nomination stable is called the nominations table on all ten articles plus all the CBB articles. I don't know why you are changing on page, but please stop. The MOS calls for the words "Nominations table". Second, there is a discussion about the week 12 nominations, if you want to join it then go to the talk page, otherwise please stop reverting and marking it up as "nominations have now been put right", they aren't wrong. The current discussion is between "didn't nominate" and "refused to nominate", the agreement is to not put the names, rather explain them in the note. Darrenhusted (talk) 23:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to administrators[edit]

I've reported your distruptive edits to the administrators. They will take it from there. DJ 01:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked![edit]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Daniel Case (talk) 01:36, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mavis789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been unfairly blocked as other users disagree with me. I have not vandalised any wikipedia account, and i would appreciate it if you could remove the block. I don't know why every little morsal has to be discussed before editing, but i feel that i have been unfairly blocked.

Decline reason:

You aren't blocked for vandalizing anyone's userpage. You are blocked for your disruptive editing. You are frequently undoing other users' edits to try to force your desired version of an article, rather than using consensus. Wikipedia is a cooperative enterprise; you are required to work together with other users in cases of disagreement. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2009[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Big Brother 2004 (UK), you will be blocked from editing. Dale 00:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]