User talk:Max Peltuinum

Welcome

Hello, Max Peltuinum, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community - subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mjroots (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gianfranco Continenza (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gianfranco Continenza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gianfranco Continenza, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Max Peltuinum! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

References revised

@CommanderWaterford:Thanks for reporting, but I believe it is incorrect. The sources confirm what I say on the page. In any case, I have added others. Can I submit again?--Max Peltuinum (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Max Peltuinum, you can resubmit any time you like of course. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@CommanderWaterford:Forgive me, but I'm a newbie. To resubmit is it enough to publish the page after having modified it or do I have to do something else?--Max Peltuinum (talk) 20:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Max Peltuinum, absolutely no problem. There is a blue "RESUBMIT" Button below my decline - just hit this one. Another reviewer will check this, it can take a while, right now more than 5,000 articles are waiting for a review. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Gianfranco Continenza has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gianfranco Continenza. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Gianfranco Continenza has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gianfranco Continenza. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Giuseppe Continenza moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Giuseppe Continenza, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello @Onel5969:! Thanks for reviewing this page. I will try to improve it on the basis of the information you have given me. I would be very happy if you could highlight on the draft the portions of text that should be better referenced or integrated.--Max Peltuinum (talk) 16:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't care about the UPE and COI acronyms. Nobody pays me to contribute to Wikipedia and I don't have a conflict of interest with anyone. Regardless of the evaluation on the item I created, this must be clear.--Max Peltuinum (talk) 16:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. My main concern is the UPE/COI issue. There are clear indications you have some relationship to the article's subject. Would you care to share how you know them? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:33, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

@Onel5969: Sorry, but I really don't understand. I am Italian and have been interested in music for about 45 years. The biographical character is an Italian jazz musician well known in Italy and abroad. There is not a single statement on the page I wrote that does not reflect the sources I have attached. As for the sources, these are books, newspapers, music magazines, archives and authoritative Internet sites that anyone can easily consult. Quite simply, he is a character in which I became interested and who, in my opinion, has all the requirements of relevance and encyclopedicity to be included in Wikipedia.--Max Peltuinum (talk) 11:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Again, there are clear indications you have some relationship with the article's subject. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

I can't help but tell you that you are very wrong. I am from Abruzzo, but not from Pescara, I have seen several concerts of him in Abruzzo and sometimes I have also had the pleasure of meeting him in person after the concert. I know very well and I routinely listen to his records. I have been studying music since the age of five, but I have a completely different profession: I am an accountant. I am not a record publisher, I am not a journalist, I am not related to him, I do not get paid by anyone to write on Wikipedia, I only deal with topics that I know thoroughly. All the assertions on the page are verifiable from the attached sources which are certainly third, since I have nothing to do with any of the books, newspapers and Internet sites, as well as with any of the magazines mentioned. I don't know how else I can prove what I'm saying. I can only say emphatically that your opinion of me is certainly wrong.--Max Peltuinum (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Giuseppe Continenza

Hello, Max Peltuinum. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Giuseppe Continenza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Giuseppe Continenza

Hello, Max Peltuinum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giuseppe Continenza".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

I am very sorry that the draft has been canceled, but I was hoping to find other contributions. In any case, thanks for your cooperation. Max Peltuinum (talk) 18:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)