User talk:Maxeboy

AfD nomination of Cmyblogs

Cmyblogs, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Cmyblogs satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cmyblogs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Cmyblogs during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 18:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Cmyos

Hi there,

I appreciate you're willing to improve the article on CmyOS, but my point of view on the issue of notability stands. IMHO, one article from the mashable blog, with one single line talking about CmyOS, does not qualify CmyOS as notable (WP:N).

I don't want to sound rude, and please don't take me bad, but seeing that your article on Cmyblogs has been deleted, I have reasons to think that you have a conflict of interest (WP:COI) to keep the article on cmyOS up and running.

For the time being, I'll be waiting for more wikipedians to give some comments on this. I suggest you to cite more sources that assert the notability of CmyOS. Regards, Ivansanchez 22:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I second the analysis of Ivansanchez. When considering notability, content generated by the subject itself does not count. That leaves the one line mentioned above as third party coverage of Cmyos. I would submit that is clearly not enough to establish notability. Erechtheus 23:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

VerdaTech Energy Management & Consulting

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article VerdaTech Energy Management & Consulting, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. User A1 03:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello,

I was the one who placed the afd request on VerdaTech Energy Management & Consulting‎, with regards to general notability. Could you please explain what your reasoning for the removal of this tag was, such that we can have a discussion regardingin this.

Thanks User A1 03:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The prod template ond VedraTech Energy Management & Consulting template has been reinstated, following its removal by yourself. I attempted to notiy you on the 6th sept, however I accidently placed the comment on your user page, rather than your talk page, and have subsequently replicated it above. Thanks User A1 15:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

It was recently commented on my talk page that I have left this discussion incomplete. As such I have relisted VerdaTech Energy Management & Consulting in consideration for the articles for deletion process. As you are the creator of this article I am notifying you of my actions to give you the opportunity to present your opinions in this regard. Thankyou User A1 11:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cmyos logo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cmyos logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Ben 21:47, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cmyos screen.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cmyos screen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Ben 21:47, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cmy logo 150x150.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cmy logo 150x150.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (X! · talk)  · @131  ·  02:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ecoenergy.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ecoenergy.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)