Jump to content

User talk:Maximuman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Maximuman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:14, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Maximuman. You have new messages at Tgeairn's talk page.
Message added 19:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tgeairn (talk) 19:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Maximuman. You have new messages at Tgeairn's talk page.
Message added 20:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tgeairn (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Ron James (comedian)   Readership: High My Inspiration
Readership: High Adam Huntsman   Readership: High Heard 'em All
Readership: Low Lemuel P. Padgett   Readership: High Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain
Readership: Low Joseph Brown Heiskell   Merge
Readership: High Tennessee Blue Book   Readership: High Green Bay, Wisconsin
Readership: Medium Frank Gorrell   Readership: High Dale Hollow Reservoir
Readership: High Richard Dortch   Readership: High Kick It Out (Boom Boom Satellites song)
Readership: High 3LW (album)   Add sources
Readership: Low Kathara   Readership: High Seven Wonders (song)
Readership: Medium John E. McCall   Readership: High List of Assemblies of God people
Readership: High Represent (Compton's Most Wanted album)   Readership: High Stitch by Stitch
Readership: High Tracey Hoyt   Wikify
Readership: High Adelbert Waldron   Readership: High Love Opus (Heavy D album)
Readership: Medium Emory River   Readership: Low Lohrke v. Commissioner
Readership: High Uh-Ohhh!   Readership: Medium The Terminator (album)
Readership: High Jimmy Dore   Expand
Readership: High Jimmy Pardo   Readership: High 40 Days for Life
Readership: High Martians vs. Goblins   Readership: High Johnnie Jackson
Readership: High Christopher Bieber   Readership: High Jurassic Park: The Ride (Universal Studios Japan)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot

[edit]

Hey,

I noticed you asked about SuggestBot over on my talk page, and I was just stopping by here to make sure I didn't accidentally make it double-post, and then I saw you've been able to sign up, which is great! Sorry about not stopping by sooner, things are fairly hectic at the moment. If you have any questions about SuggestBot, feel free to stop ask on SuggestBot's talk page or my own. Thanks again for signing up! Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Danceyman

[edit]

If Danceyman's account was hacked, it wouldn't be unblocked because it would have been compromised and accounts should only be used by that user. There is a Wikipedia guideline that allows users that have been blocked to contribute again after 6 months on the exception that the user will contribute in useful ways. If Danceyman were to contribute helpfully, I can't see why Danceyman wouldn't be able to make another account. SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

[edit]

I saw on that you mentioned on your userpage that you can never find any vandalism, but there are two ways to find them. One is to look at the Special:Recent changes or at Special:Tags, this second one logs a large amount of vandalism but often mistakes a good contribution as vandalism so be aware. I hope these links help you if you're thinking of helping remove vandalism. SwisterTwister talk 07:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

[edit]

Thank you for your contribution to Cestoda, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism and creating a sockpuppet vandalism-only account. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maximuman (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here All of my edits are constructive, until I let my idiot friends on my laptop, it's pretty clear that this work isn't done by me, I don't even know what a sock-puppet account is, this has got to be some kind of bad joke, a respected user like me, really, this is outrageous, I don't understand, I gave you a reason, you then accused me of sock-puppetry, just imagine how angry you'd be if you were banned for letting your drunk friends on the laptop, it's not fair

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay, I'm sorry that I let my computer be hacked, but please unblock me, I've been nothing but helpful up until the last few hours

I'm betting you didn't realize that account creation is logged. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So what that wasn't me, didn't I just re-iterate the fact that I was hacked, please, look at my previous edits, they're construtive, ask Tgeairn or SwisterTwiser, I was in contact with them when I first began, and I had no intentions to mess up wikipedia, I'm not impressed by your attitude to new users either, the respect you have is minimal "I'm betting you didn't realize that account creation is logged" how rude, I already said whatever happened was not my intentions, and you have the cheek to say that, I'm just trying to make Wikipedia a better place, and you're just trigger happy with banning people Maximuman (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really sorry what happened, who was it? ChiefMasterJustice (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reaper Eternal

[edit]

If you reaper eternal or any other administrators see this read. My friend ChiefMasterJustice was banned for posting on your wall reaper, he was banned for abusing multiple accounts, but he only had one, you can block me, but please don't block him he didn't do anything did he

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maximuman (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I admit responsibility for the hacking, and I was stupid to leave my laptop open, and I will assure you it will never happen again

Decline reason:

Once again, please see WP:GOTHACKED. I will lock this talkpage until you're able to provide the proof required (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:32, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.