Jump to content

User talk:Maximuswood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Legion of Dynamic Discord

[edit]

I don't know why you consider this as unimportant, since "The Legion of Dynamic Discord, or LDD, make up the bulk of Discordia's faithful." according to Lost Souls, but I've no idea what all this is about, so I'll leave it for others to argue over. Dbfirs 17:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i dont believe discordianism to solely be a religion, but it has potential in that regard. to me, its more of a spiritual belief that varies in meaning from person to person. there are no churches, there are no easy to find groups of gathering. in my opinion, the structure of would be cabals and sects are the least important thing and i didnt want to clutter up the wiki page with unimportant details taking away from what i learned about discor.. when i first read it...a year ago. interesting ideas about order and disorder.

also, the person that readded that i think was a bot. the comment was, undid removal because no subject was left after editing it out, and they thought it was a mistake.

i jsut wanna put my important info up, whoever else wants to add to or whatever can do so. its funny how i went though the history and nobody read the take down edits subject line of needing citations, so hopefully i remedy that

So, if you've no objection, when I find some good references, I'll put the section back. Wikipedia is, of course, for information that other people consider important. Dbfirs 20:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

maximus: no probthe link you sent in your first message, whoever did that page had no references. mine did

Yes, the wiki that I linked to was just publicity by that organisation, so not recommended for a Wikipedia reference. You have some good secondary sources in the article, though some links are dead. It's possible that the "Legion" is making unfounded claims, so I'll just add their site as an external link for interest. Dbfirs 21:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]