User talk:Mayankeagle

Mayankeagle, you seem to be spending a large portion of your time only editing The Undertaker and replying on the talk page, sometimes to dead discussions which are two months old, [1], one month old, six weeks old, three months old, or the result of not using the preview button or contain advertising and forum like discussion. May I suggest that you try to edit some other articles rather than concentrating on this one article. And in response to this question [2], the difference is self evident, The Dead Man, The Phenom and Big Evil are nicknames which are/were used for large protions of time, "the conscience of the WWE/WWF" is something JR would occasionally say, just as he called Billy Gunn "the best pure athlete in the WWF/WWE" but only Mr Ass and Badd Ass Billy Gunn are nicknames. Darrenhusted (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Darrenhusted - as long as I am not doing anything "illegal" or "unallowed" on Wikipedia, I have the right to make my own decision as to which articles I am interested in reading, editing and monitoring. When I respond to a question which was posted on the talk-page, I don't see when it was asked or posted. I consider it important to put an answer there for a question which was asked for the future reference of anybody who sees it, not just the person who asked it - and I don't see what is wrong in it. As far as the nick-names question goes, I was trying to genuinely understand your point-of-view of what the difference between the nick-name and descriptor is, and I guess the correct way to understand it was to ask you there itself on the talk-page instead of editing the main-article. Please use the talk-page for any discussions related to that article, and let everybody have their own personal choice as to which article they want to edit and monitor. Mayankeagle (talk) 16:45, 2 June 2(UTC)

Reply

I don't remember the exact reasons, but it has been WP:PW policy for a long time now. Future events don't get added on wrestlers pages. An IP added it to Undertaker's page. TJ Spyke 20:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parakh Madan. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! jsfouche ☽☾Talk 18:56, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parakh Madan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parakh Madan, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Parakh Madan

Hello Mayankeagle. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Parakh Madan.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parakh Madan}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mayankeagle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mayankeagle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)