User talk:Mayumashu/Archives/2009/November

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article Phoenix Pride has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not clear how this meets notability guidelines. There are some google news hits but they appear to be primarily related to an indoor soccer team or a municipal commission.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

FYI-- 20th-century people by nationality again

Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_November_19#Category:20th-century Indian people/Category:21st-century Indian people
Category:20th-century Indian people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:21st-century Indian people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Extremely redundant and unnecessary. In addition, it has been created to include only notable people (according to the creator), which is laughable because he adds it only to articles of people he considers notable personalities (both categories contain only a few names), even though they are not. ShahidTalk2me 12:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep per recent and consistent past consensus here. This has been disscussed twice in the last few months. See the August 14 and June 29 CfDs Isn't there a limit to how many times this can be done? Carlaude:Talk 04:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC)