User talk:Mayumashu/Archives/2011/June
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Families by ethnicity
Category:Families by ethnicity, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Junior Orange Bowl (tennis) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- While the Dunlop Orange Bowl is certainly notable, it is not clear that the u/12 and u/14 versions are.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StAnselm (talk) 02:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Junior Orange Bowl (tennis) for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/42px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junior Orange Bowl (tennis) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior Orange Bowl (tennis) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Re:Liam Broady
2010 Wimbledon Championships – Boys' Doubles: Liam Broady and Tom Farquharson won this event.
WP:NTENNIS: Junior players are presumed to be notable if they have won at least a junior Grand slam title, have been in the top 3 of the junior ITF world rankings or can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG.
Do you still have doubts?
PL Alvarez, Talk, 06:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC).
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:A.S. Asiago Hockey players
Category:A.S. Asiago Hockey players, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Mate Pavić
Pavić fails WP:NTENNIS, because he haven't been in the top 3 of the junior ITF world ranking. Source: http://www.itftennis.com/juniors/players/player.asp?player=100123998
Career High Combined: 5 (03 Jan 2011)