User talk:Mcbscotland

Ways to improve Donside Village

Hi, I'm Triptropic. Mcbscotland, thanks for creating Donside Village!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for the article on Donside Village. Please help improve the article by adding references. You canuse the "Cite" option on the visual editor to help you create the references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Triptropic (talk) 15:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Donside Village; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Blanking your talk page also does not enhance your credibility and they will still be evident in your edit history. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:47, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Scots language, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

I assume that you are also responsible for these dubious IP edits earlier this morning in your continued campaign to erase the diversity of opinion on this topic. You also misrepresented a source regarding offical status. Stop this disruptive behaviour. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:54, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

This repetition and elaboration of the IP edits effectively confirms that both are you so: Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Scots language, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Scots language, you may be blocked from editing. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Scots language, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been warned before about this POV-pushing campaign, in contradiction of cited text. Stop now or I will request action. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:34, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Abuse of multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

• When your block expires, please ensure you are using only one account and that you are logged in when editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)