User talk:Mcoogan75

College Humor (magazine)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of College Humor (magazine), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: College Humor. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

That's called recentism. If you really think that people might confuse the two, then move (DO NOT COPY; it messes up the copyright/licensing links) the magazine article to a new location, and create a disambiguation page with links to the magazine and the website. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

I have raised the issue on the talk page of College Humor. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

That's why I suggested a dab page, to maintain neutrality between a magazine important to literary history and an obscure modern website. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of What’s past is prologue

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article What’s past is prologue, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongomatic (talk) 18:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Russellpeters.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Russellpeters.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Russellpeters.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BlueAg09 (Talk) 11:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD

Since you are interested in Pomona College you might want to check out this AfD of a professor's bio: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Sontag. Borock (talk) 20:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Freddie Wong article

Hi you expressed your side of the deletion of the Freddie Wong article in 2008. I do not know the results of any (if any) deletion attempts but it has been nominated for deletion. You may wish to view the article again and see if you have a change of thought.

If not please cast a vote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woods01 (talk • contribs) 08:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)