User talk:Medievalpast

Welcome!

Hello, Medievalpast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Widow's Bane, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! E Wing (talk) 18:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Widow's Bane[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Widow's Bane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E Wing (talk) 18:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

What you need is better coverage. The Coloradoan is a step in the right direction (Facebook is useless as a ref). But it needs to be better coverage. It needs to be a bit more about the band. If you're in the more off-beat areas of music (i.e. not rappers, girlie bands, professional symphony orchestras, etc), you need good coverage. They can get volume - you need quality. If this gets deleted, ask me to move it to your userspace while you look for the refs. Peridon (talk) 20:09, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above was written assuming a new editor, Oooopppsss. Reading your userpage reminded me of a cousin in the USA who is a historian on whose behalf I did research on a few occasions. One was directly researching (from French language sources) the royal family of Brittany, which I got paid for with a long screed about the Roanoke Colony, which was passed to a uni student here (and helped her to her degree - citing 'unpublished' with interesting info works at uni level but not here), and another was some genealogical stuff for a third party, which helped my cousin secure 100 frozen Muscovy ducks for a banquet she had to organise. Peridon leads an interesting life at times. I wish I could get my cousin on here. She's married to someone working for Microsoft, but is computer illiterate herself. Peridon (talk) 20:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Brian Travis Band for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Brian Travis Band is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brian Travis Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Widow's Bane for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Widow's Bane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Widow's Bane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 21:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Widow's Bane for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Widow's Bane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Widow's Bane (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]