User talk:Medmig

Yurikuma Arashi

That the title is a reference to the novelization Kuma Arashi is incredibly obvious to Japanese (as obvious as, say, the official English titles for the episodes of Occultic;Nine being 1960s and 1970s rock songs) and thus generally referenced only in passing. (OTOH, it's not obvious to non-Japanese who are less familiar with the work.) The Japanese Wikipedia article states is as fact. The article says that ever since the work premiered, everyone knew that the title at least was a reference and started looking for other connections. It mentions the theory about the photograph; that sort of connection is far more tenuous and dubious, but the title is an obvious reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Thacker (talk • contribs) 17:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't speak one bit of Japanese, but if it's this obvious you should easily find a source that can support that theory, probably even an English one. – Medmig (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Voice Actors template

If you're going to be using other articles for examples, then here is one of mine. The Irregular at Magic High School. Using the voiced by template would be obtrusive and unnecessary to minor characters. Observe the recent trends such as the Naruto or Final Fantasy 13 list as well. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 20:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I agree that probably wasn't the best way to argument. But you can't decide and what is better and what isn't without giving any argument. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles#Characters do that for us and state that "The character section should include voice actor credits (if applicable, see {{Voiced by}} and {{Voiced by2}} ).", and so we should use one of the template. If you prefer {{Voiced by2}}, well ok, I won't fight, but we SHOULD use it. --Medmig (talk) 21:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

"if applicable". The voice actors are already in prose. Why else has no one stopped me from this for all my GAs from the years I've been editing WP:Anime/manga. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 21:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Ok --Medmig (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Medmig. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 11:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

You Me Her reverts

You have twice reverted the You Me Her article to remove episode capsules you charge with being copyright violations...and cite the source as a wikia wiki. Aren't they on a license similar to that of Wikipedia that explicitly allows lifting the texts for other sites? 12.144.5.2 (talk) 05:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Medmig. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)