User talk:MeganBytes
Hi there. I just wanted to explain my recent reversion of your edits to Phil Mason. Basically, Wikipedia has rather stringent rules on biographies of living persons, and they require us to make sure that what we write is neutral and backed up by reliable sources. Blogs and YouTube videos are generally not considered reliable. I realize that the article is a bit of a mess, and it already depends on sources that are questionable at best; however, the solution is to rewrite the article with better sources rather than to add even more unreliable sources. If you can find reliable sources, such as The New York Times, that discuss the controversies associated with Mason, that'd be fine. However, until that happens, Wikipedia can't really say anything about it. Infighting between bloggers really isn't something that Wikipedia documents. One thing you might consider is asking WikiProject Feminism for help. They could probably point you toward reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:31, 28 August 2014 (UTC)