Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review	5/16/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Mel_Carter
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mel_Carter/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/16/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/16/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Format is pretty good.
Grammar & composition	Good grammar.
Other comments	Good Job!

Joselv83 (talk) 03:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer: Christina geo

Date of review: 5/15/13

Name of editor: User:Mel Carter

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/13/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 5/13/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Perfect length

Image (needed/appropriate): not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: Correct formatting

Grammar & composition: Great grammar and composition

Other comments: Very nice format, clear, and straight to the point

--Christina geo (talk) 23:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer **	Wikipedia User: Angela Sandy
Date of review	5/16/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Mel_Carter
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.orf/wiki/User:Mel_Carter
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/16/2013
Date review submitted to instructor	5/16/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	The length is good.
Image (needed/appropriate)	No image needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	The textbook info is accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	n/a
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	n/a
Wikiformatting	Bullets added
Grammar & composition	The grammar and composition is good.
Other comments	Good choice on the bullets

Angela Sandy (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]