Jump to content

User talk:Melancholyhelper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Melancholyhelper!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Danilo Švara (talk) Add sources
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Energy applications of nanotechnology (talk) Add sources
41 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Wing Bowl (talk) Add sources
1,314 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: B Deborah Kerr (talk) Add sources
24 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (talk) Add sources
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Shaanxi University of Science and Technology (talk) Add sources
36 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Mark Doty (talk) Cleanup
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Patricia Young (talk) Cleanup
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C J. N. Reddy (engineer) (talk) Cleanup
89 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Lusitanian mythology (talk) Expand
30 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Xuhui District (talk) Expand
73 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C XS-1 (spacecraft) (talk) Expand
75 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Zeolitic imidazolate framework (talk) Unencyclopaedic
52 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ashur-uballit I (talk) Unencyclopaedic
334 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Foreign relations of Iran (talk) Unencyclopaedic
194 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Propellant (talk) Merge
87 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Carbon (API) (talk) Merge
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Buccal tablet (talk) Merge
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Taja Kramberger (talk) Wikify
81 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Natalie Diaz (talk) Wikify
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Islamic fiction (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Martin Körbling (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Jack Moehle (talk) Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ingvild Julie Thue Jensen (talk) Orphan
64 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ranjit Kumar (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pia Z. Ehrhardt (talk) Stub
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Aleksander Zorn (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Louis Guy Henri de Valori (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Jai Krishna (talk) Stub
26 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Julio Díaz (boxer) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 10:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Can someone explain to me whats gone on here? i have no relation to this account, thanks Melancholyhelper (talk) 08:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Melancholyhelper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

    • Update i have been blocked for over 24 hours and have not had a review for my case yet: Hello, I now see which account i have been accused of having affiliation with, the only similarity as i understand it is the 1Xbet page? and as i see it, as you can see from the discussion i have started here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#NPOV/_COI_issue. I believe the page is in need of some kind of re write? what is needed is still up for debate. As i have yet to start any pages of my own i wanted to use this as a guideline to understanding what is need to build a full page out and maybe create a few articles here and there. So far while learning the wiki ropes i have been focusing on the rules, mainly wiki-guidelines violations and vandalism and exploring other activities where i can. Which is why i find it quite surprising my account has been blocked? ThanksMelancholyhelper (talk) 11:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User is unresponsive. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Melancholyhelper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, after looking at the "blocked indefinitely" rules i am a little confused as i have not caused "significant disruption or threats of disruption, or major breaches of policy", From the blocked notice its for "abusing Multiple accounts" However, I am not connected to any account other than this one? any help would be appreciated, thanks Melancholyhelper (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In reviewing this, I concur with the reason for the block. It could be meat puppetry as opposed to sock puppetry, but either way the result is the same. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Melancholyhelper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can someone point me to the reason as to why i have been blocked, i cant seem to see what everyone is referring too? i am not connected to any other account but this one and seem to be getting shrugged off. Melancholyhelper (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User is unresponsive. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please see my last comment. For operational security we can't be too specific, but you have a similar editing pattern to the users listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keith161. As I said, it may very well be that this is your only account, but that would make this meat puppetry. It's insufficient to just say "it's not me", as every person in this situation says that. You will need to address the similarities in editing and perhaps tell how you came to edit about the topics that you did. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 09:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User talk:331dot Can you please see my most recent appeal. I have read over the guidlines and given the info i feel would be of use, i am still lost as to why this is happening other than offering solutions to a page that i thought violated wiki guidelines, Thanks Melancholyhelper (talk) 09:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:331dot none of my appeals have been looked at over the course of the last week or so, is there a solution to this? Thanks Melancholyhelper (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one open appeal is needed at a time; adding additional appeals has no impact. Please pick one to be reviewed and remove the other(you can keep the statement itself and just remove the coding). Admins are volunteers just like most everyone else, and do what they can when they can. Please be patient. If another doesn't come along I will take another look but I would prefer an uninvolved person see it, for your sake. 331dot (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]