User talk:Melitop
Melitop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Melitop is not a sockpuppet. Another editor made an accusation for Melitop of being a sockpuppet on a disputed page, and the administrator accepted that accusation. Melitop is a new user, that is ture. And Melitop shows experience in wiki, because Melitop has some experience with html language and wiki is easy to edit. But that doesn't make Melitop a sockpuppet of another user. I will appreciate if you can tell me how I can better prove that Melitop is not a sockpuppet. Thanks. Melitop (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The first edit by this account was to revert Fethullah Gülen back to a version as edited by Eranist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). That account was blocked as the result of a sockpuppet investigation. Based on that, I think that it is reasonable to conclude, by the editing course taken, that this account is also a sockpuppet. —C.Fred (talk) 03:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Melitop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wanted to make two changes to the article on Gulen. The first was that it will be misleading to state that he is a preacher, because he actually is a scholar. (To me this distinction is obvious.) The second is that he was recently selected the world's top intellectual by the Foreign Policy journal. This is, in my opinion, a very important piece of information about Gulen, and I thought that should be mentioned in the beginning of the article. The latest version I was able to find that had both of these suggestions was the version of by Eranist. So, I reverted to that version. However, when I read Eranist version more carefully I noticed that I disagreed with that in several places. For example, I didn't think that Gulen is a philosopher. So, my second and later changes only addressed the first two issues I explained above. In the meantime, another editor undid these two simple and appropriate changes every time and accused me of sockpuppeting. Why would my editorial skills and interests show that I am a sockpuppet? This is definitely not true. I have not dreamed of wiki as a place where I can not make even a single change to address my opinion without being accused of a suckpoppetry. I am disappointed. Please unblock Melitop. Melitop (talk) 03:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I agree with C.Fred that the sockpuppetry is pretty obvious, per WP:DUCK. OhNoitsJamie Talk 07:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Melitop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Since I have started editing, I have seen that there is only one editor (Arnoutf) who can make changes to the article I have edited claiming that his/her version is the consensus. All others are accused of being sockpuppets by this same editor repeatedly until an administrator (Kanonkas) disabled my account. I don't know if other accused editors are blocked by this same administrator. I think someone with administrative privileges should look into a possible administrative sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry here. Please unblock Melitop as Melitop is not a sockpuppet. Tell me what other evidence I can provide to prove this.
Decline reason:
The needed evidence is already available in the contribution histories of the two accounts. I see that immediately after User:Eranist was blocked, your account was created, which appears to exist only to restore Eranist's desired edits to the page she was blocked for disrupting. Checkusers don't appreciate being bothered with cases that are obvious already. Your edits are not consistent with those of a brand new user; they are more consistent with the edits of a more experienced editor. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|On one side, it is so clear that I show experience in editing wiki. On the other, I missed the most obvious and made it very clear to you that I am a sockpuppet of Eranist. I created my account right after Eranist was closed to make his canges, but I did the most obvious mistake and reverted the article to his/her version indicating I am a sockpuppet and thus rendering my changes useless. That is a fantastic reasoning! You didn't appreciate my request?? I did not appreciate being blocked for a false accusation either. This has been a waste of time. }}
- Your request has now been reviewed by three independent administers, which seems like a more than fair number of requests for review. At this point, further demands for review would be a waste of administrators' time, so I have protected this talk page from further edits. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)