User talk:Meow, said the cat

This is Meow, said the cat's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Kuno von Eltz-Rübenach has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kuno von Eltz-Rübenach. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 11:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meow, said the cat, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Meow, said the cat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuno von Eltz-Rübenach has been accepted[edit]

Kuno von Eltz-Rübenach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How to fix this error[edit]

An error occurred while publishing the translation. Please try to publish the page again. Error: Hit AbuseFilter: Content Translation Edits

An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, so it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter/False_positives" title="Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives">report this error</a>. Disruptive editing may result in a <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy" title="Wikipedia:Blocking policy">block from editing</a>.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzanne Avon (October 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence given of significant coverage in independent media.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suzanne Avon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Suzanne Avon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:35, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzanne Avon (October 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You only added a reference to that the person got married, not detailed biographical articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suzanne Avon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Suzanne Avon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:23, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzanne Avon (October 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:ENT, need to explain what her significant roles are in the films and whether the films are significant. Also need to connect the sources to the article not list them at the bottom. Recently added sources only show a passing mention that she participated in the film, not whether she had a lead role or how she was received. Films require linking to Wikipedia articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suzanne Avon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Suzanne Avon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:AngusWOOF just delete it already Meow^STC (Meow back) 17:58, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: La mala costumbre has been accepted[edit]

La mala costumbre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dziun has been accepted[edit]

Dziun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:12, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Coffesso[edit]

Hello Meow, said the cat, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Coffesso, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to products. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. So Why 11:49, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy:, The page is not about a product, it's about a company. You've might been mislead by the lead, but Coffesso is the company and they produce Espresso Coffee Pods as seen in the infobox. The article also lists products the company has made, and none stand out. As for the sources, source 1 is dead, but it is archived and it is a picture which not shows anything of the company. As for source 2, it isn't neutral, as it exists to promote the selling point. So I think the decline reason is not valid. Kind regards, --Meow^STC (Meow back) 14:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You are correct. I misread the first sentence and thought it was the name of the product. However, it does claim to be the first such product for Indonesian coffee beans which, if true, might actually be a significant achievement and thus fail A7 anyway. That said, I think the PROD you placed is probably the best way forward at this point. Regards So Why 14:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve La mala costumbre[edit]

Thanks for creating La mala costumbre.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

The article needs more citations to significant coverage in reliable, independent sources in order to demonstrate notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]