User talk:Meshatz
Personal sandbox[edit]
The best place for drafts is any page with a name beginning with, in your case, User:Meshatz/ I have created user:Meshatz/sandbox. I feel the references are just a bit short on establishing notability. Find a couple more and then submit via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for setting up my sandbox. I spent a lot of time finding good references and beefing it up a little. I went to submit it through AfC as you suggested, and got a nastygram back, "This page is currently protected and can be edited only by administrators." How does one proceed? Interestingly enough, Google indexed my sandbox already. — Meshatz (talk · contribs) via e-mail
OK, my instruction was too vague. When you finally reach the WP:WIZGO page, select the first option - "submit for review". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
- Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Alpha Quadrant talk 21:40, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Payoneer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payoneer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Payoneer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payoneer (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Payoneer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payoneer (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- HighKing++ 14:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)