User talk:Mharrison98

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mharrison98, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 14:25, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Hill (camera collector) (July 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Martin Hill (camera collector).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mharrison98, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References and your draft article[edit]

The actual policy is subtly different, but this guide has always served me well: For a living person we have a higher standard of referencing. Every substantive fact, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, you assert requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS.

The real policy is a little less stringent than that, but, if you aim for the stars and miss then you may well hit the moon, which is good enough Fiddle Faddle 14:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@FiddleFaddle: Thanks, that's very helpful. I may have a few other issues, but I realized that I didn't have any in-text citations. I'm putting those in right now, actually. Thanks again!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Martin Hill (camera collector) (July 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 23:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Hill[edit]

Great edits so far! There's a bit more to go before the article is ready, though. The tone is still informal in parts and there is a lot of unnecessary detail, such as the second paragraph of "Collection," describing his bowling alley. Other problematic phrases include "He once worked behind the camera, but decided he would be better at selling them than using them" and "Hill wants to preserve 'Hollywood's history,' but has little support for his effort." The first one is too informal, the second seems promotional. You should talk about what people do, not their motivations. I also recommend removing or changing the last two paragraphs of the "Collection" section, there are a lot of quotes and they make the article seem like an interview rather than an objective description. If you fix those issues, though, the article should be good to go! --Cerebellum (talk) 20:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Martin Hill (camera collector) was accepted[edit]

Martin Hill (camera collector), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 00:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Martin Hill behind Charlie Chaplin's Camera.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Martin Hill behind Charlie Chaplin's Camera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Hill (camera collector)[edit]

The article Martin Hill (camera collector) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ploni (talk) 17:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Hill (camera collector)[edit]

The article Martin Hill (camera collector) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mostly local-interest blurbs and unreliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]