User talk:Mhbent

August 2014

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhbent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

see I just joined Wikipedia about a month ago so I'm new. I made I stupid mistake by keeping on adding the same article about an upcoming artist,that was not appropriate and did not have enough reliable sources

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: only one unblock request at a time please. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly creating the same article under slightly different names to avoid detection. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhbent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Mhbent (talk) 10:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason given. I would advise you to read WP:BAND about notability for musicians, and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove notability. YouTube and iTunes are not reliable independent sources. Peridon (talk) 12:07, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mhbent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi,i understand what I did was wrong. It won't happen again. from now on I'm going to contribute articles with reliable sources Mhbent (talk) 8:45 pm, 4 August 2014, Monday (15 days ago) (UTC+1)

Accept reason:

On the understanding that you will no longer try creating articles on Kes Tokyo (at least not without reliable sources, and even then I would recommend using the Articles for Creation process), I'm lifting your block. Please be aware that any further infractions will result in your account being blocked again without warning. I'd suggest that you spend some time working in other areas of Wikipedia, improving articles, before you attempt any more page creations. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think you did wrong, specifically? What articles will you contribute to, as opposed to recreating an article about yourself endlessly? Read WP:Music to help understand why we have been deleting it and blocked you. Origamite^{\(·_·\)(/·_·)/} 06:21, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

see I just joined Wikipedia about a month ago so I'm new. I made I stupid mistake by keeping on adding the same article about an upcoming artist,that was not appropriate and did not have enough reliable sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhbent (talk • contribs) 11:48, 10 August 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Not just the "same article", but recreating it after its rightful deletion. You recognize that if you write anywhere on Wikipedia about Kes Tokyo (or whatever the non-notable artist name was) will result in a final, indefinite, non-reversible block ... the panda ₯’ 10:58, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

now i understand and i apologize about that. can someone please unblock me

Mhbent (talk) 11:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block Notice

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 23:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended your block for one month, as you continued to create alternate accounts. Please note that creating any additional accounts will most likely result in an indefinite block of your account. Mike V • Talk 20:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mhbent, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Bazj (talk) 13:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]