User talk:Michael5046

DYK

Hi. I've nominated Long Island serial killer, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. BabbaQ (talk) 14:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Long Island serial killer

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

You still reckon the Nabro eruption should be deleted?

Can you remove your deletion banner ASAP? 210.7.132.80 (talk) 23:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of James Valles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Valles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Valles (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 20:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

George B. McClellan, Jr.

Hi -- Why did you change McClellan from 96th to 91st, when the List of New York City mayors shows him as 96th? Are you making other changes like this? If so, do you have a consensus to do so? Such changes need to be discussed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, I did change it because multiple former mayors had the same numbers. The List of New York City mayors page shows the office term numbers, not the mayor's number. As you can see on the list, Michael_Bloomberg is listed under 113 even though he is the 108th mayor (as can be found on his own wiki and also on nyc.gov under his biography). Rudy Giuliani, which is listed as term 112 on the mayor list, is also referenced 107th mayor on his own page and as 107th on the nyc.gov website. The problem is that, in the past, some NYC mayors served a term and then served again years later. For example, Thomas Willett served in 1665, followed by Thomas Delavall in 1666 and then Thomas Willett again in 1667. And Thomas Willett also served again in 1667 and then even a third time in 1678. All those are given different office term numbers on the list, which is why people have been using wrong numbers. Michael5046 (talk) 03:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I found the page I think you used. You are right about him being the 93rd, apparently. So all the other mayors have wrong numbers too. Looking.. Michael5046 (talk) 03:42, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Corrected the mayor numbers for all of them. What I said above was correct, but two non-elected acting mayors were previously counted. Michael5046 (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, that was the situation. I have corrected the numbering system used in the List article, because using a non-official counting system amounts to original research. I don't think, however, we can take it back farther than consolidation, at least until we find an official city website that numbers the mayors before consoidation -- have you found that? Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Found it: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcas/html/features/greenbook_mayors.shtml Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Excellent. Michael5046 (talk) 04:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I've adjusted the numbers for pre-consolidation mayors, so now they're all in line with the city's numbering. I'm not sure why Thomas Hood isn't included in the city's list at all, since they do list the other two acting mayors (but don't number them). Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Incidentally, I've removed Hood from the list. From what I've found an 19th-century list accidentally listed Thomas Noell as Thomas Hood, and that list was copied to many other sources. Some later sources then "corrected" the problem by including both names, but I've seen no authoritative sources that show that "Thomas Hood" was every mayor of NYC. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from 2012 Malian army mutiny with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ankit Maity^Talk_Contribs 08:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Overturned convictions in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gail Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. When you recently edited Hurdegaryp railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Renaming in SA

Hi Michael, I reverted your move of Machadodorp as the new name is, although official, not the more common name and is virtually non-existant in common usage. Even the local municipality still uses the original name. Please leave the article at Machadodorp until the new name is even close to common. Bezuidenhout (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1898

Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1898 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kumioko (talk) 01:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Letting you know- ‎Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1900–1909

I've replied to you here.[1]...William 15:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Now that the TfD has closed, see this thread. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of floods by death toll

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of floods by death toll. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of deadliest floods. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of deadliest floods - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Eastlaw ^talk ⁄ _contribs 09:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Marczyński

It was found that the article had been changed to the biography of a different person. It has been reverted to the bio of the original subject and is now ok to keep. I have withdrawn the request for deletion, but need you to change your comment to qualify the AfD for Speedy Keep. --Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 21:22, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1915

Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1915 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William 14:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ice (1998 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Brazzaville Il-76T crash: which airline?

Hi. I read the BNO News source you supplied and its aircraft-disavowing statement attributed to Trans Congo Airlines, but I still have my doubts, caused by this:

"Database confusion By Simon Hradecky on Saturday, Dec 1st 2012 17:05Z

It appears there is one Russian Aircraft database which attributed the aircraft to "Aero Service" (former Aero Service Africo), while other databases correctly have the aircraft with Trans Air Congo (confirmed by Congo's Government). Some other Aviation News Service took up on that database and thus became the root of all identifications of "Aero Service" despite clear statement by Congo's government.

Both operators have their homebases in Pointe Noire.

There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of the aircraft being associated with Aero Service before Nov 30th 2012, while there is plenty of evidence of association with Air Highnesses since 2008 (before Heavylift Congo) and Trans Air Congo since 2011." http://avherald.com/h?article=459df3ac&opt=0

So... can you confirm the validity of your edits by some other source, including airline databases? --Mareklug ^talk 18:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi there. I don't know, that was the most recent news report I had at the time. But I went to the Facebook page of Trans Air Congo and it denies they owned the plane: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=391224444296510&id=107380929347531 Michael5046 (talk) 19:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

By the way, I see aviation-safety has also updated it from Trans Air Congo to Aero Service.Michael5046 (talk) 19:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Actually, no, as they have been ascribing the aircraft to Aero Service from the beginning. They removed the question mark from the registration number field and added the one-liner about the reports that the aircraft crashed perhaps on approach from the other end rather than overran 23R. I still cannot locate definitive confirmation one way or the other, and I just don't trust the sourcing that we have so far. So monitor Aviation Herald's page and other sources and be ready to rewrite all of this again. :) --Mareklug ^talk 19:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of rail accidents (2010–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derailed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Kim Ju-ae

Hello, Michael5046,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kim Ju-ae should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Ju-ae .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:48, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your cut & paste move of 25 July 2013, from List of rail accidents (2010–19) to List of rail accidents (2010–present)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give List of rail accidents (2010–19) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into List of rail accidents (2010–present). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Set theorist (talk) 10:26, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

2013 Volgograd bombings

I came here to post our standard message about cut-and-paste moves, only to discover that you'd already received it (directly above). Please don't do this again. —David Levy 06:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar
	Gerald Shields, founder of the North Korean Fashion Watch, awards you the North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar for your continuing efforts to add reliable and poignant discussions about North Korean topics, such as Ri Sol-ju. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Pyongyang Time) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pyongyang Time, Michael5046!

Wikipedia editor Bobtinin just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good job on the your recent Pyongyang article. I found it interesting how they could decide to just change their timezone. Anyways, good work, and keep it up!

To reply, leave a comment on Bobtinin's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Merger discussion for Time in North Korea

An article that you have been involved in editing—Time in North Korea —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Las Vegas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clark County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Office of Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Norris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Unnamed island off Gwadar listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unnamed island off Gwadar. Since you had some involvement with the Unnamed island off Gwadar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of ballooning accidents by death toll, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Columbus, Davie and Garner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ann Johnston (American politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ann Johnston (American politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Johnston (American politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Michael5046. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Terrorist incidents in Turkey in 2017

Template:Terrorist incidents in Turkey in 2017 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Samsara 07:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Wrong airport

I removed this edit[2] of yours. Japan Airlines Flight 715 crashed while on approach to Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport not Kuala Lumpur International Airport and according to at least one of the very references you were using for the entry. ASN says it took place on approach to Kuala Lumpur Subang International Airport. Subang isn't Kuala Lumpur International Airport but Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Catharina Meessen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catharina Meessen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catharina Meessen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shooting of Robert Godwin

The article Shooting of Robert Godwin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Shooting of Robert Godwin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shooting of Robert Godwin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting of Robert Godwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2017 Resorts World Manila attack

On 2 June 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2017 Resorts World Manila attack, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T♦C 09:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Edgar Preca) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Edgar Preca, Michael5046!

Wikipedia editor Winged Blades of Godric just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good!

To reply, leave a comment on Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Winged Blades ^Godric 09:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Oskar Anton Bilharz

Hi, I'm Ajpolino. Michael5046, thanks for creating Oskar Anton Bilharz!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please fill in the references with more information to avoid WP:LINKROT. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ajpolino (talk) 05:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Michael5046. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Gremloids listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gremloids. Since you had some involvement with the Gremloids redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)