User talk:MichaelJPierce
Greetings. Thank you for taking such great care on the PJ page, I appreciate it. Belgarath TS (talk) 03:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Your "NPOV Edits" of the PJ page are not exactly that. They come off as you supporting PJ at the expense of the police, who are only doing their jobs, and seem to be advertisements for him at the police officers expense. This is not NPOV. Love cops, hate cops, the fact is how you feel about them has no place on that page. Thanks. Belgarath TS (talk) 04:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- I made no such claims. I only paraphrased what the CITED SOURCES said. You on the other hand are extruding information that is UNCITED. MichaelJPierce (talk) 04:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Please read WP:V under burden of proof. As the editor restoring or adding material the burden is on you to provide a citation, which you failed to do here: [1]. There is no requirement to provide any time for someone to provide a source for something. Any material which is challenged can be removed immediately at the discretion of the editor challenging it. It should not be restored without a citation.--Crossmr (talk) 22:48, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- There were citations removed during the constant vandalism of the page. Plus, by openly discussing the issues before taking action reduces conflict. As you can see the page is now semi-protected making undoing poor edits more difficult. I blame people with so much pride in "being right" that editing the page has become far more work than it is worth it to me. It's clear that there are a number of biased egos involved right now on the project. I'd rather not involve myself further. 71.213.29.171 (talk) 03:24, 13 October 2011 (UTC)