User talk:Michaeldsuarez/Archive 3

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Feel free to browse through this archive:

Thank again[edit]

Hello Michaeldsuarez. I appreciate you informing on the use of my quote. I agree it is very unfortunate for me, and I'm a bit surprised. I didn't think it seemed like a biased comment. I'm glad you played a little defense on my part by pointing out that my record speaks for itself. I'm a believer in action speaks louder than words, and my edits show that I am unbiased, and only present verfiable facts and sources. I'm not really going to get into it on the signpost because I feel the MFD was a biased assault against the wikiproject conservatism, and shouldn't have brought about in the first place. Disputes should be on an article by article basis. Thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjrj24 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asshole[edit]

This guy is an asshole and keeps stalking any of my user accounts!90.221.22.38 (talk) 03:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom election 2011[edit]

I'm technically an OTRS member. Its also not a complete list of my socks but trying to put together a complete list (the most obivious ones you missed are user:Genicoord and the unused user:UK voteing account) would result in the table looking rather silly.©Geni 20:53, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A fair chunk of the first page of Special:ListUsers was create by me to push some rather nasty attacks off the first page (This was before usernames could be changed). User:Arbcom Candidate was created as an example account for the arbcom 2006 elections. I've create a lot of accounts over the years to test things and the like so I honestly can't say if any given list contains them all.©Geni 21:45, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is "Mandatory statement:I'm prepared to identify to the foundation if elected." missing something?©Geni 13:20, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Anwar Yusuf Turani, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages War of independence and Uyghur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative[edit]

Hi Michaeldsuarez,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Restore[edit]

Hi! I was wondering, what up with your "restore" edits to Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action? (Not criticizing, just curious.) --Guy Macon (talk) 17:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:SOPA initiative/Action#RfC page is busted again. An IP accidently deleted all the support votes, it got restored to just before the IP's edit, so 19 intermediate revisions by 16 users got deleted. Michaeldsuarez restored the votes and comments that got deleted. It looks like they are all there. Well done Michaeldsuarez, have a brownie. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I've already told Guy Macon about it, and he or she acknowledged the problem and expressed thanks. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	This Barnstar of Diligence is being awarded for extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service while repairing some serious problems that cropped up during the SOPA vote. Good job! Guy Macon (talk) 06:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help on List of US Congresspersons who support or oppose SOPA/PIPA[edit]

Your title was way better than the one I had. :) Good work! --HectorMoffet (talk) 06:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

WP:ANI[edit]

Selery's attacks against you are being brought up at ANI. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Selery.27s_attacks_on_an_editor. for the discussion. Flutter shy !xmcuvg2MH 23:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Fluttershy checkuser[edit]

Hello, Michaeldsuarez. You have new messages at WilliamH's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your involvement with Wikipedia Review[edit]

I see that you are a user of Wikipedia Review, a website devoted to critisising Wikipedia and our editors. You are a constructive contributor to Wikipedia, so I wonder what your motivation is for using a site like WR? The site and its users are frowned upon by many users here. Paolo Napolitano 17:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppetry notice[edit]

thank you for the note. ive never been through this, so i will read the guide on what to do next. -badmachine 01:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dave[edit]

Happens to be my first name. Amazing coincidence, no? Collect (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of Possible Interest[edit]

I saw your comments on the Newt story as well. Thought you might be interested in participating in this project. King4057 (talk) 01:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

oh and/or this Wikimania submission. King4057 (talk) 04:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Michael. They just posted my blog. Would you say this is about right? King4057 (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Joe DeSantis[edit]

Hi, Michael. I goofed up the other day when I changed the section header at Enough, Joe. My mistake—I mis-read what was happening there. Thank you for reverting my change. A question: why was it wrong for Joe D to remove "third wife" from Callista's article? (I agree with Joe that it doesn't belong). --Kenatipo ^speak! 18:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How is this useful[edit]

This comment makes very little sense, and is not overly germane to the discussion. Jimbo praised something; I echoed the praise, but raised a concern. I wanted to see a response - you don't think I know that I would eventually talk directly to the editor in question? Like, seriously? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RainbowDash / Futtershy and an unsuccessful ArbCom candidate[edit]

May I ask what you hope to achieve by asking every unsuccessful candidate? Do you expect one of them to turn around and say "yes, it was me, please bring the lynch mob round"? And, assuming any benefit is gained from knowing who it was (which I'm not seeing), has it not occurred to you that a simple process of elimination using publicly available information drastically narrows the field? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. I do not use IRC for discussing Wikipedia. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for finding that broken webcitation link on Fast Five and fixing it. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 20:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Web archive[edit]

Hi,

I noticed that you fixed my link to the web archive on Grass Mud Horse. Are there directions somewhere on how to do it right? Or maybe you could explain to me. I find directions for things hard to follow. Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stifling of criticism[edit]

Michael, do you condone what the "friends of ED" have done to stifle free speach and criticism of encyclopediadramatica.ch?

http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/index.php?title=Encyclopedia_Dramatica:Thizzlehat_Junction_Center&diff=prev&oldid=327444#Brandt_pulls_the_plug_on_wikipedia-watch.org

If not, why have you not spoken out about it? 156.17.232.191 (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was just asking for information, and now I have the answer: http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:DanielBrandtFriendsOfRyanCleary.jpg. I'm also spreading that answer around: http://www.betabeat.com/2012/02/15/scroogle-may-have-been-a-victim-of-hackers-not-google/. As far as I'm aware, ED isn't responsible for what happened to Wikipedia Watch or Scroogle, so I can't condone or condemn ED for what happened. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL ^this ♥♥♥ 74.3.165.39 (talk) 04:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image use on WP:Teahouse[edit]

Michael,

Thanks for the heads-up about non-free image use on Teahouse. I'll let the rest of the hosts know to be careful which images they use for their avatars. - J-Mo 01:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Michaeldsuarez. You have new messages at AbigailAbernathy's talk page.
Message added 19:29, 7 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Abigail was here :D _{Talk to Me.} _{Email Me.} 19:29, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China article[edit]

Since you have previously discussed about the Republic of China, I guess you are interested to share your insights at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.128 (talk) 18:58, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on Jimbo's talk page[edit]

Sorry, I removed your comment. Niabot is wrong about the dates, but mentioning the user by name here will get you blocked, as it should. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: My talk[edit]

I wasn't. Hot Stop^UTC 17:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for this fix: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Expedition_of_Abdullah_Ibn_Unais&diff=477571256&oldid=453585377 --Misconceptions2 (talk) 03:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

You need to know some stuff about copyright. I have a question, on youtube i see video's of football matches (or highlights of goals scored), they are quickly removed, but if somone record a video of a football match with a camrea it does not get removed, which i found interesting. similiarly if i took pictures (not scans) of copyrighted imaged with a camera and uploaded on wikipedia, would i be allowed to use them or would that still be copyright?--Misconceptions2 (talk) 14:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"This site may harm your computer" link removed[edit]

I bring this revision of Wikipedia:List of online reference desks to your attention. If you disagree with that revision, please discuss it with User:KappaPhi. I have added that user page and yours to my watchlist.
—Wavelength (talk) 15:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help us develop better software![edit]

Thanks to all of you for commenting on the NOINDEX RfC :). It's always great to be able to field questions like these to the community; it's genuinely the highlight of my work! The NOINDEX idea sprung from our New Page Triage discussion; we're developing a new patrolling interface for new articles, and we want your input like never before :). So if you haven't already seen it, please go there, take a look at the screenshots and mockups and ideas, and add any comments or suggestions you might have to the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Immunology[edit]

I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 09:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution survey[edit]

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Michaeldsuarez. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 23:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Im Dienst des Diktators, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercedes-Benz 200 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Michaeldsuarez. You have new messages at Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry's talk page.
Message added 15:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The Cavalry (Message me) 15:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Regarding User talk:Tnxman307#Problem with abusive mod., where you have been mentioned.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!

We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ opened[edit]

An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 12, 2012, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Lord Roem (talk) 01:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Karla Homolka[edit]

they botched the phrasing, but im glad someone noticed. :) -badmachine 13:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

arbcom[edit]

hi. thank you for pointing me to that. i have never commented on an arbcom case before, and everytime i edit the drama boards, my watchlist explodes. i believe that i made the redirects after finding an examiner article that named that party. i can remove the redirects, or comment on the arbcom case, both, or neither. plz advise. :) -badmachine 14:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i am reading it, and have it watchlisted, but the examiner didn't give much background, and people there are referring to stuff i dont know about, sometimes cryptically. as for arbcom-grade drama: it cant be worse than certain usenet groups. :D -badmachine 14:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration note[edit]

Hello Michaeldsuarez. Per a request by drafting arbitrator SirFozzie in the Fae case, I have added you as a party. If you have any questions about this, please direct them to him. Regards, Lord Roem (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Just wanted to offer a belated thank-you for the courtesy notification. I always appreciate a friendly heads-up when I've been mentioned. 28bytes (talk) 04:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Arbitration evidence is too long[edit]

Hello, Michaeldsuarez. Thank you for your recent submission of evidence for the Fæ Arbitration case. As you may be aware, the Arbitration Committee asks that users submitting evidence in cases adhere to limits regarding the length of their submissions. These limits, currently at 1000 words and 100 diffs for parties and 500 words and 50 diffs for all others, are in place to ensure that the Arbitration Committee receives only the most important information relevant to the case, and is able to determine an appropriate course of action in a reasonable amount of time. The evidence you have submitted currently exceeds at least one of these limits, and is presently at 920 words and 15 diffs. Please try to reduce the length of your submission to fit within these limits; this guide may be able to provide some help in doing so. If the length of your evidence is not reduced soon, it may be refactored or removed by a human clerk within a few days. Thank you! If you have any questions or concerns regarding the case, please contact the drafting Arbitrator or case clerk (listed on the case pages); if you have any questions or concerns about this bot, please contact the operator. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, HersfoldArbClerkBOT^(talk) 16:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:FingerLakesWiki.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FingerLakesWiki.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask why you keep pestering me on Wikipedia?[edit]

You constantly come on here, and put a watch on all my accounts. Don't lie, because I know accounts can be watched. When I sue Wikipedia (any time now) then I will be bringing up a lot of factual stuff about you and your history with ED. I hardly ever look at ED now. It's shit. Why don't you go back there and actually leave the people who want to edit on real wikis (like I) alone?78.148.96.51 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

centralized CUOS nominations[edit]

Why do you need to ask permission? If you get a chance please do my editsemi request. 71.212.226.91 (talk) 21:55, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I rather not act unilaterally. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

But I think i'm going to have to say no to your proposal to nominate me, just for now. I've had advice from several people telling me that it would be best until the Arbcom case you're involved in to be over first (and it does appear that you are not going to be blocked). Furthermore, I think I would like to wait to see if anything comes about from the RfA reform 2012 proposals. If certain powers end up being unbundled, that will significantly change the setup and focus of RfA. I also feel that I should get a bit more experience in areas like CCI first, so I will be more likely to get support for wanting to have the tools to help in that area. Thanks though. Feel free to ask me again in a few weeks though and I hope the Arbcom case goes...well, well. In this particular case, I feel like it would be better if none of the sides were unduly punished, as I feel that all participants have both a point and have also done some things rather wrong. Silver seren^C 00:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just based on what i'm seeing in the case itself. It's really not focusing on you much at all besides here and there, but who knows. Arbcom may decide to block you for a while because of the ED thing alone, which, admittedly, is pretty bad. Silver seren^C 01:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Michaeldsuarez. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2012 CUOS appointments/CU/DeltaQuad.
Message added 19:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Replied to your comment -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 19:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

You're right not all do. Out of curiosity which behavior and type of treatment are you referring to. I understand if you'd rather not specify. NewtonGeek (talk) 12:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That situation was avoidable. NewtonGeek (talk) 13:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hey, you think this guy could be that guy? I know that feel (talk) 21:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[1], [2], [3] – No. As far as I'm aware, MBaxter1 and Poetlister are from two different countries. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:08, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Arcandam (talk) 09:58, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would personally support a much stricter policy on legal threats (you can summarize it as "indef first, ask questions later") but unfortunately it is a dynamic IP and a rangeblock would probably result in a lot of collateral damage. Did you read Jayron32's comment? Arcandam (talk) 00:53, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]