User talk:Micheladv92

Micheladv92, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The

Adventure

Hi Micheladv92!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image suggestion[edit]

Hi Micheladv92, what do you think of inserting some other images? Next to the trial would be nice, since it's such a massive block of text, but you'd have to think about something. Anyway, I found a nice image that is related to Baretti: https://ia802708.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=/18/items/dictionaryofengl01bare/dictionaryofengl01bare_jp2.zip&file=dictionaryofengl01bare_jp2/dictionaryofengl01bare_0005.jp2&scale=4&rotate=0 Here you find all the infos you need in order to upload it to Commons (if it's not there yet): https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofengl01bare The best thing is, it is not in copyright anymore.--Navarco (talk) 14:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your useful suggestion, it was very kind of you. I was thinking about images of the trial, but I actually couldn't find anyone. This is an alternative, as it is the dictionary Baretti was working on at the time, which I will surely upload. Thank you for the idea! Micheladv92 (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions[edit]

Hi Michelav92! I've read about your suggestions and I found them so interesting. It's quite difficult to find detailed informations about famous gangs of footpads but I'm trying to work on it. As regard adding images on watchmen I think it will be misleading because an article on watchmen already exists. Last, I will certainly create more links to improve the article! Thanks a lot, you've been very helpful!Im 2u (talk) 15:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

suggestions[edit]

This article needs more thought!  --Jfclegg (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear :@Jfclegg: I have tried to report all the different witnesses of the trial, outlining the different point of views, but maybe you are right, I could expand my article with some more considerations to improve it. Is it what you meant? Thank you very much. Micheladv92 (talk) 15:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]