User talk:Michellewho

March 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Aaron Neville has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 15:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - your recent edits to many biography pages where you merely added a link to a website were all reverted as they are considered spam and do not add any meaningful content to the articles. Please see WP:EL for information on what types of external links are allowed. SpikeJones (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. richi (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle, I have replied to your email ... richi (talk) 22:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your email[edit]

Michelle, I'm not surprised your edits are being reverted. Most of your edits look like spam or vandalism:

Please stop adding unencyclopedic links to your radio show's Web site.
Please stop removing templates and tags.
Oh, and don't forget to sign talk page comments with four squiggles, like this: ~~~~

If you do it again, you will be blocked. I'm amazed you haven't been blocked already ... richi (hello) 20:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:SPAM, WP:COI, and WP:RS. If you still think a particular article would be improved by adding a link to your Web site, feel free to discuss it on the article's talk page, but you are advised not re-add links that have been removed by other editors.

The comment about "usurp" was a message to me from another editor ... richi (hello) 23:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB links[edit]

I think the best answer I can give you is that IMBD is seen as a reliable source. I'm not suggesting that your radio station isn't -- I have no idea one way or the other. Wikipedia operates on a consensus basis, so if it's not clear to editors that your links are to a reliable source, they will get removed. You can try to build consensus by discussion. Glad to see you're starting to do this ... richi (hello) 18:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]