User talk:Deuwberst

January 2013

Hello, I'm Areaseven. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mitsubishi Mirage, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 08:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to [[:#willpower]], but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the official album booklet will.i.am credits track 5 "Let's Go" (featuring Chris Brown) as written by Artem Stolyarov. This is standard practise when an artise samples elements of another artist's song. HOWEVER, Will has already admitted that the sample as not cleared properly and that Arty should have been given full credit as a producer here. once the legal situation is fixed and resolved we can update, but until then the album booklet names Arty as a writer not producer of "Let's Go". Instead of shouting the odds why not engage in discussion with those who disagree with you. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 21:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Heatbeat may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] and electro house production duo that was formed in 2006 by Agustin Servente and Matias Faint (.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.last.fm/music/Heatbeat |title=Heatbeat |work=Last FM |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to RL Grime, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 180.0.194.86 (talk) 01:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at RL Grime. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 123.224.88.207 (talk) 22:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at RL Grime. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. 122.18.223.224 (talk) 01:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fiat Professional, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pickup and FCA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Musical artist infoboxes

Hi there, see this for help with genres for musical artists. Specifically, "Aim for generality (e.g. Hip hop rather than East Coast hip hop)". All those previously listed were very specific sub-genres of House music, seems fair enough to me to just simply use that instead. Cheers, Nik thestunned 13:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Škoda Karoq

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Škoda Karoq. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. — Smjg (talk) 21:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Škoda Yeti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossover. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nina Kraviz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minimal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kia Stonic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 03:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Hyundai Kona shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Also, did you just threaten me with your quote: "if you don't see difference between crossover and hatchback quit with editing automotive articles"? Areaseven (talk) 12:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Your recent editing history at James Joseph Dresnok shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization ^Talk 11:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning - if you continue to revert at James Joseph Dresnok we will take the matter up at the Edit Warring Noticeboard. General Ization ^Talk 15:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Michge. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kia Cee'd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saloon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peugeot 508, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BMW 3 Series Gran Turismo

Hi Michge. Regarding how the GT is classified, the references currently in the article call it a hatchback: [1], [2]. If you believe that it classified as a liftback, can you please provide references that show these are incorrect? Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 21:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Audi Liftback/fastback discussion

You look to be getting nowhere on this liftback/fastback thing so I would suggest that you and any other involved editors have a discussion at Talk:Audi A7. Toasted Meter (talk) 13:49, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Michge. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kia Soul. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 00:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kia Soul. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. When a new model has been presented, and has been covered in reliable sources, you can add it, but not before then. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 18:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Kia Soul, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please do not threaten other editors with comments such as: "IT IS COMFIRMED THAT NEXT WEEL NEW SOUL WILL BE UNVEILED, VANDAL", as such comments do not help with your reputation as an editor Areaseven (talk) 09:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Areaseven (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See this complaint at WP:ANI. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #57240

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noting block log PLWIKI --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deuwberst (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been 6 years since I've been definitely blocked on the en-wiki. From the time perspective, I see what led me to this blockade and today I would report by myself somebody who acted like that. I fully confirm that my general behavior, overreacting approach, and offensive attitude towards others couldn't end up any other way but the ban. I want to apologize and express my will to get back on track. I've worked out issues that made me a difficult contributor and today I'm trying to be a valuable member of the project. On Polish Wikipedia I'm recently the most active automotive-area article creator, trying to put the whole effort into the growth of valuable content. Please, unblock me and let me show I'm not that person who deserved the blockade back in 2018. I've grown up, that's another thing - I was a kid back then, actually. Let me prove that people can understand their wrongdoings and take advantage of their past mistakes to be better person in the present day. Give me another chance!

Decline reason:

Since you've brought up your record on pl-wiki, please address your history there, where (since your block here) you've been blocked repeatedly for personal attacks and edit warring. I'm inclined to unblock here, but we're not particular tolerant of personal attacks here either. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Michge (talk) 16:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: Thank you for expressing your kind feedback, as I've said before - I'm aware how problematic user I was, being dipped in that negative behavior affected my native wiki project as well and there's nothing to hide on this matter either. My reflection covered my general contributions and issues on all global wiki projects, hence the reason I'm posting my request now. All I can do is to apologize and promise I'm fully aware now what exactly led me to my issues, starting with being offensive towards others. I would never post this request without being aware I can not ever repeat my behavior. Please, do not decline my request. I would like to have a fresh start, it's part of my own improvement plan. Do not decline so quickly. Michge (talk) 20:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'm assuming good faith and unblocking. Good luck and have fun! --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive moves

See HERE for instance. A11, A13, and A15 were all used by Chery, in export markets at the very least. Your moves are disruptive and I recommend discussing beforehand, see WP:BEFOREMOVING. Deleting all mention of the alphanumeric names is outright vandalism. Please change. Mr.choppers | ✎ 15:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As for what to label articles on Chinese cars, read WP:CARNAMES before you carry out any more moves. This is English language WP, so if a car has a unified name in English-speaking markets (cf Mazda Axela v Mazda3) then that's the name we use. Mr.choppers | ✎ 15:52, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How are these "A11/A13/A15" names global? They clearly were not, so what's your point? Except for the Fengyun, which was mostly a China-aimed car, all of these cars had dozens of local export names, so how are you trying to find that "only" one among these, instead of simply using the main, Chinese-market name? That's why I've made it consistent. Instead of calling my edits "disruptive" I would rather hear counterarguments, as I've provided mine before submitting all of these three name changes. Deuwberst (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also deleted all mention of the alphanumeric names and [incorrectly] stated that they do not exist. For page moves which are not clearly uncontroversial, please go through the process. Mr.choppers | ✎ 17:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]