User talk:Mijanursrkr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem: User:Mijanursrkr/sandbox/The World Of Tagore[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as User:Mijanursrkr/sandbox/The World Of Tagore, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://penncamera.in/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at User talk:Mijanursrkr/sandbox/The World Of Tagore saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ColinFine (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The World Of Tagore (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ammarpad was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please see, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:ADVERT
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
–Ammarpad (talk) 14:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox links[edit]

Final warning Mijanursrkr, this is to you and @1914 Komagata Maru: and @Theworldoftagore: which are clearly all operated by the same person. Next time you link Pen N Camera International or Mehmood Ali (producer) to either a draft page or a userpage, I will block all of you --Jac16888 Talk 17:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The World Of Tagore[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The World Of Tagore, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jac16888 Talk 13:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:The World of Tagore.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The World of Tagore.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1914 Komagata Maru[edit]

A tag has been placed on 1914 Komagata Maru requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7. Unremarkable film. Photography hasnt begun, cast hasnt been announced yet either. One passing mention, that an year ago.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —usernamekiran(talk) 12:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1914 Komagata Maru for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1914 Komagata Maru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1914 Komagata Maru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 12:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mehmood Ali (producer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mehmood Ali (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehmood Ali (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid editing[edit]

Information icon

Hello Mijanursrkr. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mijanursrkr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mijanursrkr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I advise you to comply with this disclosure requirement now, before you make any other edits. Otherwise this account will be blocked as an undisclosed paid editor. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


March 2018[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mijanursrkr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

now i understand that how to creat wiki page and i promise that i'll never edit any page too much, please unblock me and this pages Pen N Camera International, Mehmood Ali(producer) and 1914 Komagata Maru Mijanursrkr (talk) 14:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. Not four. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to blank or to alter declines for existing blocks. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mijanursrkr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize and would like to request an account unblock. This account is not unauthorized. I agreed that I have made a mistake in many time editing of pages, these pages are Mehmood Ali(producer), Pen N Camera International and 1914 Komagata Maru, and also uploading pictures into commons with the wrong creative commons license, please revert the Three Pages (Mehmood Ali(producer), Pen N Camera International and 1914 Komagata Maru) and I will not repeat it again ever. Mijanur SarkarMijanursrkr (talk) 11:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲水 11:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still don't get it. You disrupted Wikipedia with your paid editing activity. You must agree not to do that again, specifically that you will never again create an article in main space in which you have a conflict of interest. You have not demonstrated an understanding of Wikipedia's policy against using Wikipedia as a publicity medium. The only content you should be creating is in draft space, properly submitted for review. If you cannot agree to that, you should not be editing on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock[edit]

Copyright problem: User:Mijanursrkr/sandbox/The World Of Tagore[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as User:Mijanursrkr/sandbox/The World Of Tagore, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://penncamera.in/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at User talk:Mijanursrkr/sandbox/The World Of Tagore saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ColinFine (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The World Of Tagore (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ammarpad was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please see, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:ADVERT
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
–Ammarpad (talk) 14:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox links[edit]

Final warning Mijanursrkr, this is to you and @1914 Komagata Maru: and @Theworldoftagore: which are clearly all operated by the same person. Next time you link Pen N Camera International or Mehmood Ali (producer) to either a draft page or a userpage, I will block all of you --Jac16888 Talk 17:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The World Of Tagore[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The World Of Tagore, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jac16888 Talk 13:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:The World of Tagore.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The World of Tagore.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1914 Komagata Maru[edit]

A tag has been placed on 1914 Komagata Maru requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7. Unremarkable film. Photography hasnt begun, cast hasnt been announced yet either. One passing mention, that an year ago.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —usernamekiran(talk) 12:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1914 Komagata Maru for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1914 Komagata Maru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1914 Komagata Maru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 12:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mehmood Ali (producer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mehmood Ali (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehmood Ali (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid editing[edit]

Information icon

Hello Mijanursrkr. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mijanursrkr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mijanursrkr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I advise you to comply with this disclosure requirement now, before you make any other edits. Otherwise this account will be blocked as an undisclosed paid editor. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


March 2018[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mijanursrkr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

now i understand that how to creat wiki page and i promise that i'll never edit any page too much, please unblock me and this pages Pen N Camera International, Mehmood Ali(producer) and 1914 Komagata Maru Mijanursrkr (talk) 14:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. Not four. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to blank or to alter declines for existing blocks. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock (final)[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mijanursrkr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize and would like to request an account unblock. This account is not unauthorized. I agreed that I have made a mistake in many time editing of pages, these pages are Mehmood Ali(producer), Pen N Camera International and 1914 Komagata Maru, and also uploading pictures into commons with the wrong creative commons license, please revert the Three Pages (Mehmood Ali(producer), Pen N Camera International and 1914 Komagata Maru) and I will not repeat it again ever.Mijanursrkr (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your appeal is a regurgitation of your appeal above from 7 March. You have not paid attention to anything we've been saying. We cannot restore articles that were deleted as inappropriate. You also would not be permitted to work on them if you were unblocked. Given that you haven't expressed an understanding of what you did that led to your block (hint, read fully WP:PAID and WP:COI and WP:NOTPROMOTION and WP:NOTABILITY, all of which you violated), and you haven't stated exactly what you intend to do if you are unblocked, you have provided no valid reason to unblock you. As far as we can tell, unblocking you will only result in more of the same problems that got you blocked in the first place, so no administrator will consider your appeals until you are able to make a convincing case that you will not use Wikipedia as a publicity platform and explain exactly what you will do. Now that your talk page access is revoked, you can request unblocking via WP:UTRS but I advise you against wasting anyone's time until you have gained a clear understanding of the policies we operate under, and can explain that understanding in detail. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are now just wasting our time and not listening to anything we say, I have revoked your talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 12:03, 12 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mijanursrkr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20938 was submitted on Mar 20, 2018 11:04:40. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 11:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mijanursrkr&oldid=1043814703"