User talk:MikePancho

March 2013

Hello, I'm Sagaciousphil. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yorkshire Terrier because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SagaciousPhil - Chat 17:18, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry

Just trying something out. MikePancho (talk) 17:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Miami Heat

Why did you add Miami Heat to the List of designated terrorist organizations? Nicolas1981 (talk) 02:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Because I thought they were... MikePancho (talk) 23:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

MikePancho, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi MikePancho! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Victim was changed by MikePancho (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90229 on 2013-04-09T00:03:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Echoedmyron. Your recent edit to the page Whip It (film) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Echoedmyron (talk) 01:36, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Guy Lenox Prendergast. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Echoedmyron (talk) 01:36, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

• Hello, Echoedmyron. I was just going through and tidying up small errors that I have noticed whilst perusing. MikePancho (talk) 01:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Teddy Pendergrass with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —Mikemoral♪♫ 01:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Was he not? MikePancho (talk) 01:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MikePancho. You have new messages at Mikemoral's talk page.
Message added 02:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Mikemoral♪♫ 02:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Zagalejo^^^ 02:35, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MikePancho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am just trying to figure things out on here, like citing and adding pictures and whatnot, not really meaning any harm MikePancho (talk) 02:46, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

With edits like this and your continued vandalism, despite multiple warnings to stop, I don't think there's much to be gained from unblocking you. m.o.p 03:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2016

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MikePancho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked at this time. I feel i have learnt the ways of Wikipedia. There are too many tasks and not enough good Samaritans. I would like to make my mark. MikePancho (talk) 02:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm sure it's entirely a conincidence that the IP that got autoblocked earlier today because you used it was engaged in vandalism yesterday. Huon (talk) 02:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.