User talk:Mikeben4420

January 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fatin Gökmen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Xiongnu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Zyma (talk) 17:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Modu Chanyu. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Zyma (talk) 17:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
This includes the times where you have logged out to continue edit warring.[1] --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ottoman Empire, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 22:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Touman, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 22:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Please stop making a mess of the infoboxes in the articles you are editing. If you wish to add useful content to the infobox, please do so without destroying its formatting, so that other editors can review your changes. Future edits where you destroy the formatting of the infobox will be reverted regardless of the value, if any, of the changes you are making. General Ization ^Talk 23:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Osman I. General Ization ^Talk 23:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]