User talk:Mimidelight

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm IndianBio. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Art of Letting Go, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Art of Letting Go. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Art of Letting Go was changed by Mimidelight (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884197 on 2013-06-25T06:26:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Art of Letting Go[edit]

Please do not remove the Gadafi concert reference. The only reason that "Save the Day" was mentioned in the Billboard article was because of the Gadafi concert controversy. If that had never happened, we would have never known about the song as it would have never been mentioned. Also the background and production of the album are two different things. Please discussion on the talk page Talk:The Art of Letting Go and once there is a consensus then we can remove it but right now the very existence of the song came about because Billboard report on the Gadafi concert links. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to The Art of Letting Go. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now you've gone and added a load of unsourced information and merged the background with the production. If you look at other album pages as an example you'll see that the information is separated out into sections. Comments like "However, a late 2011 release for a single never materialized. Carey took a break from May to August 2011 to spend time with her newborn twins. She then returned to resume work on the album in September 2011" are not sourced by reliable sources. You've also added unecessary fancruft like "She then returned to resume work on the album in September 2011. Jermaine Dupri took to his social network Global14 to reveal two new photos of himself and Mariah in the recording studio with the following caption: "ME AND MC IN THE STUDIO RIGHT NOW, (WE ARE BACK TOGETHER)". Carey also tweeted one of the photos and said "so happy to be back in the studio with the one & only @Mr_Dupri aka Jermash!" which could be sumarised in the sentence "in September 2011, Jermaine Dupri confirmed that Carey had returned to the recording studios with himself." Everything else in the quote is completely irrelevant. My edit to the article trimmed the fat and left just the encyclopedic information. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just restore my edit? I'd paragraphed the article properly and formatted many of the sentences. It reads like a diary at the moment. E.g. "in January... in February etc." — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Art of Letting Go with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 03:35, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Art of Letting Go, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:29, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:29, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]