User talk:Mineisbiggerthanyours

Statement of fact

I have unequivocally the largest penis in the entire world. Fact.

May 2016

Hello, I'm NewEnglandYankee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jeremy Irons has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 14:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User Talk:Meatsgains. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Regardless of what you believe to be anyone's motivation, this sort of behavior is self-defeating; it will achieve the opposite of what you claim to want. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 14:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User Talk:Meatsgains. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jeremy Irons. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Irony

@NewEnglandYankee: Isn't it ironic that a user can call others all sorts of nasty names and tell them to kill themselves, and only get warnings, but as soon as he admits to trolling he's blocked? That's something Wikipedia might want to work on changing. Mineisbiggerthanyours (talk) 14:46, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mineisbiggerthanyours (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't really want to be unblocked. I just want someone to undo my vandalism at Talk:Glenn Beck. It was very inappropriate.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — foxj 15:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Really?!

@Foxj: Are you daft, or did you just not read my request?! I asked that someone revert my comments on Talk:Glenn Beck. I can't do it because I'm blocked. I insulted another user. Please revert it. Or somebody else revert it, I don't care. @NewEnglandYankee:?

May 2016

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]