User talk:Missed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey Missed, :)

Are you sure about the corrections on the Andy Warhol page that you made? The book isn't a transcription is why I'm asking. The first chapter is (phone call between Warhol and Brigid Polk), maybe the last chapter too, but then the book goes on as a collection of Andy Warhol philosophy "snippets". --Smqt 16 December 2006

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mraz-galaxy-cover.png[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mraz-galaxy-cover.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Stratics has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 23:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, what I spotted was a removal of the references section... Were I mistaked? Snowolf How can I help? 23:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The journey cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The journey cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Stratics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

website with no reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 23:43, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stratics for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stratics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stratics (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jontesta (talk) 00:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]